Stay Informed
Follow us on social media accounts to stay up to date with REHVA actualities
Even more
focus must be put on well functioning and low energy consumption of Indoor
Climate installations, if we are to meet the existing and coming demands for
ensuring both control of healthy indoor climates and low energy consumption.
Ventilation
Technology for such demands to Indoor air quality is already on the market.
Installations
of indoor air systems – or indoor air installations – have severe cost impact
in buildings, and have in most cases been thoroughly designed before any
installation works are initiated at the building site.
Everything
should be easy to accomplish: Buy the specified components and units, ensure
that everything is CE marked as demanded, put the stuff together according to
the design engineer’s specification. Then, plug in, push the green button and
enjoy an excellent indoor air climate. PERFECT.
Those who
are involved in building processes have the knowledge of constraints and
bottlenecks which must be solved during the construction. Cost implications are
usually the battlefield for construction and civil engineering companies.
Hence, successful companies are those that have learned how to better cut costs
during the construction phase.
BUT is this
a law of nature? Must it stay this way?
We don’t
accept it to continue in this manner!!!
The above
mentioned nature of construction companies, subcontractors and
sub-subcontractors, has improved significantly over the last decades, and the
cost structure has dramatically changed. The economic power, that used to be
placed at the construction companies’ internal “civil engineering processes”,
are now distributed into several building blocks – for the complete
construction program.
The major
change has been the cost of the technical package installed in new buildings or
during general renovation.
Indoor air
systems play a significant role in this change of allocated building costs, and
furthermore it has become the major portion in the running costs of the
building during use.
Indoor air
systems have their natural structure, and one of the rules is that final
adjustments and inspection of functionalities cannot be made before the
building is nearly finished. The difficulties of running the indoor air
installations in conjunction with heating, lighting and office equipment limit
the possibilities for functional tests during construction. And partial
approvals of installed systems are not an option.
Indoor air
systems must be proven functional and operational when the systems and the
building are in the stage of nearly being handed over to the owner or the
tenants. This challenge has been addressed in many manners throughout the
different building traditions in the various nations.
In the
Nordic countries, we began using the quality control way, as it seems logically
easy to ensure that the new European quality control systems would be
functional enough to guarantee the aimed assurance of well installed and well
functional indoor air systems, which would meet the aimed energy consumption,
in general.
It works
well in some building programs, but unfortunately not in several others. That’s
not good enough!!
The
traditional systems using partial approvals and sectional acceptance are not
suited for indoor air systems installed during the construction process.
It is also
unlikely that several other technical systems shall always achieve their
targeted functions by using this traditional methodology, that has its
historical background in economic reasons that require partial payments. Such
partial payments are due to be paid at specifically agreed milestones in the
building program. The mechanism is ok for that purpose, of making partial
payments, and it must be kept, as it works well for that purpose.
However,
and as mentioned earlier, is it necessary to introduce tests that ensure that
technical installations work properly in such a manner that they simulate the
complete building.
Over the
recent years, the term “Commissioning” has been used for such inspections and
tests of technical installations. It is especially clear to everyone that
indoor air systems can only be properly inspected and tested when the building
construction is completed, and other installations are installed and working as
well. Secondly, the influences from other installations must be carefully
specified, as to ensure correct stipulation of effects, for the on-site
measurements or the theoretical technical calculations.
The clever
methodology of Commissioning is, in other words, inspection of installed
systems, and spot checks of randomly sampled rooms and sections throughout the
building - in other words, measuring the indoor air systems production of
airflow, directions and energies in the air and for the transportation of that
energy. The impact of the indoor air systems and the other heating and or
cooling installations and the impact from windows, as to facilitate correct
energy calculations - which can be scaled up for the entire building.
Using such
a methodology proves to tenants and building owners that installed systems are
working properly, and it verifies that energy calculations are met at
satisfactory levels. Running costs has been part of the financial motivation
for investing in the specific building, and they will be an everlasting bill to
carry as long as the building is used. Additionally, such a methodology will
clearly ensure the contractor that his component deliveries and installation
work is correct. This is a new behavior, but it is at the same time also a
win-win situation.
Figure 1 shows how much the energy use to run indoor climate systems varies in the European cities.
Figure 1.
Example of typical energy transported through air handling units in different
climates in Europe.
It is logic
that control of indoor air flow and energy put into the air for heating and
comfort is a valuable factor to be in control of, from the first day such
systems are put into operation. That is a major responsibility we have at our
desks.
SWEDENhas been the first national market to implement a legal requirement on functional checks of the ventilation systems. Since 1991, the so called OVK (compulsory ventilation check) regulation forces the owner of a building to ensure that the ventilation system works as intended. These OVK checks must be made before the buildings are taken in daily use, and thereafter at repeated fixed intervals. The regulation states that the OVK checks must be undertaken by an officially authorized inspector – an “OVK-besiktningsman”.
The “Besiktningsmannen” inspects the
installations and approve it, ensuring that the legal demands are fulfilled and
that the mechanical system functions are as intended. Such inspections must be
undertaken when a tenant is replaced or the ownership of buildings is changed.
DENMARKis well on its way of implementing a new
standard for Commissioning. It is as well an extension to the revision of the DS447 Standard for Building Ventilation. That revision highlighted the
necessity to establish a new methodology, to ensure that the higher demands for
indoor air installations are obeyed, so that heating and lighting energy
improvements can be shown to be working at the end of a building process. The
necessity to prove the energy frame is met – it is the way to ensure
the demanded low energy consumption onwards, and to hold energy expenses at
budgeted levels. DS447 Specifies demands for mechanical, natural and hybrid
ventilation systems.
DS447 is an
integrated part in the building Code.
The Energy
Frame is the legal demanded level which must be met in a planned building
program, and is specified by law. It is clearly expressed in the Building
Regulations. The Energy Frame sets limits for energy supplied for heating,
ventilation, cooling, hot water supplies and lighting. That gives for instance
52.5 kWh per m²per annum plus 1 650 kWh as a unified
addition per flat.
It seems
logic that such low energy levels per m² need detailed inspections of the
Climate shell and the technical installations independent of each other. The
inspections are only possible and/or natural in different time capsules in the
building program, and demand further developments, as to be detailed enough in
how new materials, building processes and completion works coincide.
It will be
an issue in that process of making the new Danish Commissioning Standard to
specify that, and how user behavior must be handled, and how user behavior must
be linked to the commissioning report.
NORWAY has minimum requirements for environment and health, including indoor environment and ventilation
of buildings, given in following codes:
·
Technical
Regulations under the Planning and Building Act added with guidelines
·
The
Working Environment Act with guidelines.
Demands
concerning material emissions are included.
Minimum energy performance requirements are given in separate codes, as TEK § 14.
The minimum
Energy Performance of a building is fulfilled by:
·
Satisfying
demands to specific solutions or
·
Satisfying
demands to total net energy demand (Energy frame)
A method
for calculation of the energy performance of buildings is an integrated part in
TEK: recommendation, NS 3031:2007+A1:2011 – Calculation of energy performance
of buildings –Method and Data [[1]]
According
to this method (with the given normative input), ventilation (incl. optional
cooling) stands for 10-15% of the energy budget (net energy demand) for
residential buildings, and 30–50% for non-residential buildings. Specific
energy measures regarding ventilation as given in TEK are foreseen, i.e.:
·
Heat
recovery in ventilation plants, average temperature efficiency over a year:
80%/70%.
·
Specific
Fan Power in ventilation plants (SFP) :
▫
None
residential buildings: 2/1 kW/m³ s (occupied/not occupied)
▫
Residential
buildings 2,5 kW/m³ s (day and night)
It is
practically mandatory to install balanced ventilation with high efficiency heat
recovery.
Air tightness
in new buildings of 1,5 air changes per hour at 50 Pa pressure difference
(small houses 2,5).
NS 3700:2010 Criteria for passive houses and low energy houses - Residential buildings[[2]] and
prNS3701
Criteria for passive houses and low energy houses – Non Residential buildings[[3]]
(in force spring 2012)
indicates the level of future minimum demands in building codes.
The
Norwegian Energy Certification System (ECS) [[4]]
demands an energy
certificate to be acquired for all new buildings and all buildings being sold
or rented. Energy inspection of technical installations including ventilation is
(with limitations in accordance with the EPBD) is required to be carried out every
4th year, with the first time within two years after handing over. The Energy
inspection is a first step to minimum requirements for commissioning of
technical installations.
The Norwegian
Building Authority has developed a guideline [[5]]
to perform an independent building control. New regulations regarding
independent building control will enter in to force 1.7.2012.
Some examples
of control items:
· Airtightness
· Energy performance
· Ventilation
In
preparation for entering the new regulation regarding independent building
control, prNS 8450 – Control of design and building of construction works, was
launched. The document was however not accepted.
There is
now a discussion on the need for development of supplementary information to
the Norwegian Building Authority guidelines.
FINLANDhas since 1995 an Indoor Air Classification
into three classes, S1, S2 and S3, as target levels for the various uses of
indoor spaces. This classification gives a possibility to define and specify
higher target values than just the minimum level regulated since 1987 in part
D2 of the National Building Code of Finland, which also sets some minimum
requirements for ventilation system commissioning, such as an obligation to
check the air tightness of ductwork and to measure supply and extract air
flows, both for the whole building and for individual rooms. Revision of the
Classification as well as revisions of the Finnish Building Code in 2008 and
2012 strengthened the demands of air tightness as to limit the energy used for
indoor climates.
It is
practically mandatory to install heat recovery in ventilation, and demands concerning
material emissions are included in good indoor air design practice.
It is also
to a wider extent demanded to prove air tightness in new buildings and to prove
functionality of indoor air installations also in real practice.
Inspections
aren’t yet on the level as a commissioning will be, but improvements are been
made via training of supervisors and inspectors.
The aim is
to close the gaps mentioned in this article.
The aim is
to establish a workable win – win environment for everyone in building programs, in a controlled way, and transparent in the working
process in erecting buildings as this is works now. The new method should
include the technical systems because they are, in most cases, responsible for
the major share of the building initial budget, and they will cost even more
during the use of the buildings during their lifetime.
Energy
losses are significant in too many indoor air systems, and the ECO design
initiative has only impact on the components used in the Indoor climate systems.
This statement simply means that ECOdesign establishes rules for products which
a manufacturer can be taken to court for if it doesn’t perform as demanded in
the ECO design regulative.
The EPBD
sets, from the building point of view, rules for how the components in the
market must be built into systems that will ensure the low energy consumption
target specified for the individual building and in accordance to national and
European legal demands.
We have the
possibility to be frontrunners in well doing. When the good practice is one
step ahead of the legal system, then this good practice can become the legal
minimum, and make it possible for the legal system to understand the complexity
in indoor climate systems combinations through proven experiences, meeting BAT
(Best Available Technology) theories without being able to have all details
controlled and steered every second. We, who have dealt with these issues in
this area for a lifetime, have realized that.
In
addition, numerous institutes and scientists have analyzed and evaluated which
parameters need to be governed and controlled thoroughly. Both are dedicated to
achieve good Indoor Air Quality, and to do it at the lowest energy use as
possible.
It is a
common knowledge that air leakages in ducts and ductworks, in too many
ventilation systems, cause severe loss of energy. It is not only loss of air,
planned to be inflated in specific building sections or rooms, it is as well
the energy put into that air – as for instance heating or cooling energies. The
EU made an analysis, and the Fraunhofer Institute in Frankfurt took the
complete analyzes to a higher level with a detailed analytic calculation. That
calculation defines the loss, or waste of energy, due to simple leakage, if the
average simple ductworks, which is the normality in the most systems installed
during the latest 30 years, is installed. If such systems were only one class
higher in tightness as to the Class B level, the savings potential are at least
15%.
·
Using
the energy consumption for air transport in Europe, which is statistically
defined to be around 197 000 GWh/a
·
15%
of that – equates to 29 550 GWh/a
·
The
equivalent amount of CO2 gives (660 grams/kWh) a total of 17 730 000
ton per annum.
That
analysis gives a scale of the importance of why it is necessary to use new
methods in inspections and control of such systems during their lifetime, but
the EC, in the recast of the EPBD, didn’t introduce a requirement for the
outcome of such findings to be implemented, i.e., that severe malfunctions or
energy losses should they be corrected properly, within a limited period of
time. It seems that the politicians didn’t have the courage to demand that
energy savings that have been detected throughout Europe should always be
implemented.
It is sad
that the indoor climate industry has been so neglected in the overall political
arena, when it is a statistical evidence, from all formal statistical annual
analyses, that energy used in buildings is approximately 40% of all energy used,
compared to transport, that counts for 28% of the energy used. The society and
politicians pay attention to the 28% and don’t find means or aims in how the
larger portion, the 40% consumed in buildings, can be reduced. The components
are on the market and in the warehouses, but legal actions – similar to what is
normal for transport – cannot be highlighted in the political agenda.
Tight
buildings reduce energy losses, but require controlled ventilation and heating
installations as to secure proper indoor air quality for users. We need to
adjust accordingly to reach that, via intelligent new methods in the manner and
systems we will be using in the future.
And the
indoor climate industry must join forces in the marketplace and the political
arena to convey the knowledge we have to the decision makers.
[1] http://www.standard.no/no/Sok-og-kjop/produktkatalogen/Produktpresentasjon/?ProductID=507701
[2] http://www.standard.no/no/Sok-og-kjop/produktkatalogen/Produktpresentasjon/?ProductID=422901
[3] http://www.standard.no/no/Nyheter-og-produkter/Nyhetsarkiv/Bygg-anlegg-og-eiendom/2012/Passivhus-yrkesbygninger--horing-pa-ny-standard-er-avsluttet/
[4] http://www.energimerking.no/no/
[5] http://www.dibk.no/no/Tema/Uavhengig-kontroll1/Nyheter-uavhengig-kontroll/Veileder-og-opplaringspakke-om-uavhengig-kontroll-er-klar1/
Follow us on social media accounts to stay up to date with REHVA actualities
0