Stay Informed
Follow us on social media accounts to stay up to date with REHVA actualities
Recently
the international media like in USA, Canada, UK, Denmark, Germany etc. has been
discussing the issue of differences between men and women regarding thermal
comfort and the preferred room temperature. This presentation will discuss the
issue of thermal comfort and the existing knowledge on the influence of gender.
In their paper, researchers Boris Kingma and Wouter van MarkenLichtenbelt (2015) state, “Indoor climate regulations are based on an empirical thermal comfort model that was developed in the 1960s. Standard values for one of its primary variables—metabolic rate—are based on an average male, and may overestimate female metabolic rate by up to 35 percent”. According to their experiment with 16 females performing sedentary work, they measured a significant lower metabolic rate for women than the metabolic rate for a “standard man”, which they found in literature. This will, according to the authors, result in a higher preferred room temperature for women.
Fanger (1982), Fanger and Langkilde
(1975), and Nevins et al. (1966) used equal numbers of male and female subjects, so comfort
conditions for the two sexes can be compared. The experiments show that men and
women prefer almost the same thermal environments. Women’s skin temperature and
evaporative loss are slightly lower than those for men, and this balances the
somewhat lower metabolism of women. The reason that women often prefer higher
ambient temperatures than men may be partly explained by the lighter clothing
normally worn by women.
Study | Sex | Preferred ambient temp. (°C) | Mean skin temp. at comfort (°C) | Evaporative weight loss during comfort (g/m²/hr) | Number of subjects |
Nevins et al. 1966 | Males | 25.4 | 488 | ||
Fanger 1982 (both studies combined) | Females | 25.8 | 488 | ||
Fanger & Langkilde 1975 | Males | 25.0 | 33.6 | 19.5 | 32 |
Females | 25.1 | 33.4 | 16.6 | 32 | |
Comfort equation Fanger 1982 | 25.6 |
Subjects were tested under the following
standardized conditions: sedentary activity: light clothing 0.6 clo, rel. velocity <0.1 m/s, rel. humidity 50%,
mean radiant temperature = air temperature.
Figure 1. Preferred ambient temperatures (air
~operative temperature) in laboratory test with the same sedentary activity
level (1-1.1met) and the same clothing (~0.6 clo)
for all subjects.
Looking at
the existing literature (Karjalainen 2011) clearly
more than half of the laboratory and field studies have found that females
express more dissatisfaction than males in the same thermal environments. A Meta-analysis
shows that females are more likely than males to express thermal dissatisfaction
(ratio: 1.74, 95% confidence interval: 1.61–1.89). Females are more sensitive
than males to a deviation from an optimal temperature and express more
dissatisfaction, especially in cooler conditions.
However,
most studies found no significant difference in neutral temperatures between
the genders as also shown in the basic studies in the table.
Existing
international standards like ISO EN7730, EN 15251 and ASHRAE 55
are based on the same basic studies described above. These standards do not
specify different room temperatures for women and men when doing the same work
and dressed in similar clothing.
Type of building/ space | Category | Operative temperature for energy
calculations °C | |
Offices and spaces with similar activity (single offices, open plan offices, conference rooms, auditorium, cafeteria, restaurants, class rooms, Sedentary activity ~1,2 met) | Heating (winter | Cooling (summer | |
I | 21.0 – 23.0 | 23.5 – 25.5 | |
II | 20.0 – 24.0 | 23.0 – 26.0 | |
III | 19.0 – 25.0 | 22.0 – 27.0 | |
IV | 17.0 – 26.0 | 21.0 – 28.0 |
Contrary to
what has been suggested, these standards are not devised exclusively for
men. They are based on extensive
laboratory studies of both men and women wearing the same clothing, engaged in
the same activity, and exposed to a wide variety of thermal conditions (air
temperature, surface temperature, humidity and air movement). Metabolic heat production was simply a proxy
for the kind of activity. And while it
is one of many variables used in an empirical formula, it is not an input to a
heat balance equation, as one might find in a thermo-physiological model (which
exists, but was not the basis for the standards)
A 2009
study in the journal Indoor Air examined temperatures in 100 office buildings
and found the average indoor air temperature in the summer was not only cooler
than recommended and cooler than the established comfort zone for office
workers about 22.9°C, it was cooler even than the temperature set in the winter
to about 23.4°C.
In the main
studies, where they did the same sedentary work and wore the same type of
clothing, there were no differences between the preferred temperature for men
and women. So the researchers’ finding of a lower metabolic rate for females
will not influence the recommended temperatures in the existing standards. Also
their study is not conclusive. They only studied 16 females at a sedentary
activity. They should also have studied 16 men at the same activity to be able
to compare. The reason why we, in some field studies, find that women prefer
higher room temperature than men is attributed to the level of clothing. Women
adapt better their clothing to summer conditions while men are still wearing
suit and tie. So if the thermostat is set to satisfy the men, the women will
complain about being too cold. In the standard, this adaption of clothing to
summer is taken into account so if the standard is followed the women would be
satisfied; but maybe not the men
There can
be many reasons why buildings are often too cold. Here are some possible
explanations:
·
Some buildings overcool air to reduce humidity.
·
Some Air-Conditioning systems do not work well under part load conditions
·
People think the air conditioning isn’t working if it’s not a little cold
·
Being able to make people feel cold in the summer is a sign of power and
prestige
·
Men stuffed into heavy suits may control the thermostat
·
Energy is too cheap giving people little incentive to save on the air
conditioning
The
extensive studies, which form the basis for existing international standards
for the thermal environment (ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55, ISO EN 7730, EN 15251)
included equal amount of male and female subjects and no difference in
preference was observed. Despite this fact, we may often find women are colder
during summer time in air conditioned offices. This can however, in most cases
be attributed to the difference in clothing level between men and women. It
seems the thermostat settings in summer in air-conditioned buildings are often
too low and below the recommended range in existing standards.
ASHRAE 2013.
Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy ASHRAE standard 55-2013.
EN 15251, Indoor environmental input parameters for design and assessment of energy performance of buildings—addressing indoor air quality, thermal environment, lighting and acoustics. CEN, 2007.
EN ISO 7730,
Moderate thermal environments—analytical determination and interpretation of
thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal
comfort, 2005.
Fanger, P.O., and G. Langkilde. 1975. Inter-individual differences
in ambient temperature preferred by seated persons. ASHRAE Transactions 81(2):
140-147.
Fanger,
P.O. 1982. Thermal Comfort. Robert E. Krieger, Malabar, FL.
Karjalainen
2011 - Thermal comfort and gender- a literature review. Indoor Air, 2011.
Kingma, B. and van MarkenLichtenbelt,
Wouter.2015. Energy consumption in
buildings and female thermal demand. Nature climate change, Letters, August 3,
2015.
Nevins, R.G.,
F.H. Rohles, Jr., W.E. Springer, and A.M. Feyerherm. 1966. Temperature-humidity chart for thermal
comfort of seated persons. ASHRAE Transactions 72(1):28.
Follow us on social media accounts to stay up to date with REHVA actualities
0