Stay Informed
Follow us on social media accounts to stay up to date with REHVA actualities
Cécile JolasProject manager in
University of La Rochelle (LaSIE laboratory),
attached to its Technological Platform for Energy Efficiency, Typee.cecile.jolas@univ-lr.fr | MaximeDoyaProject manager in University
of La Rochelle (LaSIE laboratory), attached to its
Technological Platform for Energy Efficiency, Typee.mdoya@univ-lr.fr |
The building is located in the city of La
Rochelle, on the French Atlantic Coast, with geographical coordinates:
46°09’07.09”N, 1°07’00.07”W and an altitude above sea
level of 7 m. Under Köppen’s climate
classification, La Rochelle features an Oceanic climate. Seasonal weather is
made of mild dry summer period and mild and humid winter periods. The
characteristic values of the climate are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Climatic relevant aspect of
La Rochelle.
ISO 877-1:2011 classification | Marine
west coast climate |
Physical information | La
Rochelle (France) |
HDD (Base 18°C) /CDD (Base 22°C) | 2068/21 |
Average Annual Air Temperature | 13.0°C |
Average Annual Relative Humidity | 80.6% |
Rain amount (mm) | 755 mm |
Solar Irradiation | 1 337 kWh/m² |
Average Wind speed (m/s) | 4.2 m/s |
Fetch distance from the ocean is less than
4 km, with a yearly sunshine duration of 2200 hours per year, La Rochelle
is the most isolated place of France’s Atlantic coast.
Supported by the Social Housing Agency of the urban area of La Rochelle
(www.office-agglo-larochelle.fr) and managed by the University
of La Rochelle (TipeePlateform),
Rupella-Reha is one of the award-winning projects
launched by the French Environment and Energy Management Agency (ADEME) in
2011. This project involves retrofitting three buildings of the Social Housing
Agency, located in three different districts of the city, with a global
approach (indoor air quality, thermal, acoustical and visual comfort, solar energy
systems etc.). VLS 500 is one of these three buildings with an objective of 35 kWh/m².y (primary energy consumed on site). Its retrofit started
in 2013 and the design phase ends at the beginning of 2016. Further to this
period, the works will last eighteen months and will be completed by a
monitoring period of two years. The design team is mainly composed of the
architect “Cointet et associés”,
engineering companies “ITF” and “Atmosphère” and the
University of La Rochelle. Cointet et Associés are the project manager for the Social Housing
Agency, in charge of design and economic parts. ITF and Atmosphère
are in charge of improving envelope and building systems. Eventually, the
University of La Rochelle is the project manager for ADEME.
VLS 500 was built in 1974 displaying a
cubic geometry (Figure 1). Because of its layout similar to the others buildings of
Villeneuve-les-salines, VLS 500 is a distinctive architecture
of this district.
Figure 1. The district of
Villeneuve-les-Salines.
The building is composed of four blocks (Figure 2) of flats
with sixty-four residential units and less than one hundred occupants. Two
blocks have six floors above the ground, while the two others are limited to four
floors (Figure 3). The net conditioned floor area is 4 900 m² and the
glazing percentage (overall window-to-wall ratio) is 20%.
Figure 2. The four blocks of VLS 500.
Figure 3. A four and six floors block.
In France, as most of buildings built in
the seventies, the VLS 500 envelope was built out of prefabricated
components. For the four blocks, each component of the building envelope (external
walls, internal partitions, slabs and roofs) was developed with the same
materials and according to a unique sequence of material layers. In spite of a
detailed study about the building before retrofit, many physical
characteristics or materials remain unknown.
To improve the thermal performance of the
envelope, the design team proposed several retrofit actions. Reinforcing
thermal insulation of external walls and windows was advocated using
prefabricated externally insulated element to address the occupied site issues.
This new layer is hitched to the current external wall, enlarging the total
thickness from 25 cm to 40 cm (Figure 4).
Figure 4. Prefabricated wall hitched
to current external wall.
This prefabricated wall will include the
new windows and will improve the airtightness because of this optimized assembly
process. Moreover, because of retrofit intervention is done with the occupants
inside, this technology permits a shorter intervention and a site less noisy.
Characteristics of the building components before
and after retrofit are described in the following Table 2.
Table 2. Thermal characteristics
before retrofit.
Before retrofit | After retrofit | ||
External wall | Construction | From exterior to interior: reinforced concrete (7 cm), polystyrene
(4 cm) and reinforced concrete (14 cm). | From exterior to interior: 15 cm of insulation (fiberglass) in a
wood frame, the current external wall (25 cm) |
Thickness [m] | 0.25 | 0.40 | |
U-value [W/m²∙K] | 0.731 (estimation) | 0.2 | |
Flat roof | Construction | From exterior to interior: Gravel (5 cm), extruded polystyrene (5 cm), reinforced concrete
(14 cm) | From exterior to interior: Gravel (5 cm), Polyurethane (20 cm), reinforced concrete (14 cm) |
Thickness [m] | 0.25 | 0.39 | |
U-value [W/m²∙K] | 0.689 (estimation) | 0.122 | |
Ground floor slab | Construction | From exterior to interior: Reinforced concrete (14 cm) | From exterior to interior: Reinforced concrete (14 cm). insulation |
Thickness [m] | 0.14 | — | |
U-value [W/m²∙K] | 3.692 (estimation) | 0.256 | |
Walls between the
internal environment and unconditioned spaces | Construction | From exterior to interior: reinforced concrete (9 cm), insulation (5 cm),
reinforced concrete (9 cm) | |
Thickness [m] | 0.23 | ||
Intermediate slabs | Construction | A unique layer of reinforced concrete (14 cm) | |
Thickness [m] | 0.14 | ||
U-value [W/m²∙K] | 2.495 (estimation) | ||
Internal partitions | Construction | A unique layer of bricks (10 cm). | |
Thickness [m] | 0.10 | ||
Thermal bridges resolution | Specific features adopted in reducing thermal bridges through building
envelope | A specific attention was given to balconies’ thermal behaviour in order
to reduce thermal bridges. A certain number of balconies will be destroyed. | |
Airtightness | n50 [1/h] | Six residential units tested: results from 1.4 to 4.39 | |
Window 1 | Typology | Single glazing with wood frame | Double glazing (argon) with PVC frame |
U-value windows [W/m²·K] | 4.95 (estimation) | 1.4 | |
Window 2 | Typology | Double glazing with PVC frame | |
U-value windows [W/m²·K] | 2.9 (estimation) | ||
Shading | Type of solar shading | Louvered shutter |
VLS 500’s HVAC systems are not the usual
systems employed for social housing buildings construction, for years in France.
Only the ventilation system can be qualified as “standard” with natural
ventilation strategy based on stack effect. From 1974, the heating and the DHW
systems are connected to the district heating system of Villeneuve-les-Salines (distributing pressurized hot water to 2 136 flats).
This district heating system is one of the first in France. Otherwise, a part
of DHW is produced by solar collectors installed on the roof (flat plate
collectors).
Because of VLS 500 is a pioneer building
for using renewable energy technologies (RES) in the 70’s, the design team highlighted
pro-arguments to the Social Housing Agency in order to rise the amount of RES
to aim a nZEB performance. This increase of RES has
become possible for two reasons: a special wood frame is built on the current
roof to support 465 m² of photovoltaic panels (65 kWpeak)
and the ten years old solar collectors are replaced by evacuated tube
collectors (thirty-five units).
Figure 5 displays the solar study to optimize productivity of photovoltaic
panels and solar collectors.
Figure 5. Improving RES by a solar
study.
During the period of time in which the
heating system is switched on, the surplus of hot water produced by these new
collectors shall be used to preheat water for heating system. During the
switched off period, the surplus is injected in the district heating to avoid
overheating (Figure 6). Except the solar thermal power stations, this combination was never
used before in France on building retrofitting operations.
Figure 6. Schema of solar collectors.
As the same time as these RES actions, the
heating system is updated and the ventilation system is modified to a hybrid
strategy powered by low-pressure mechanical ventilation systems.
Figure 7 displays an architectural view of VLS 500 after retrofit.
Figure 7. VLS 500 after retrofit.
In accordance with the French Thermal
Regulations (RT 2012/RT-ex 2005), building energy performance after and before
retrofit has to be calculated with a legal computation engine, specific to refurbishment
operation. Also, the Effinergy association is the
only French institute to deliver nZEB certification
for new constructions. Therefore, the energy performances of VLS 500 are
calculated with the legal computation engine and compared to French nZEB criteria (Table 3).
Table 3: Energy uses before and after
retrofit
Energy uses & renewable energy before retrofit | |
Total energy uses (Primary energy calculated
with national conversion factors) (kWh/m².y) | 135.11 |
Space heating (kWh/m².y) | 109.27 |
Hot water (kWh/m².y) | 14.63 |
Ventilation (kWh/m².y) | 0 |
Lighting (kWh/m².y) | 7.54 |
Auxiliary (kWh/m².y) | 3.68 |
Renewable energy produced on-site: solar
collectors (primary energy) | 53 534 kWh |
Energy uses & renewable energy after retrofit | |
Total energy uses (Primary energy calculated
with national conversion factors) (kWh/m².y) | 44.04 |
Space heating (kWh/m².y) | 23.41 |
Hot water (kWh/m².y) | 10.01 |
Ventilation (kWh/m².y) | 1.88 |
Lighting (kWh/m².y) | 7.03 |
Auxiliary (kWh/m².y) | 1.71 |
Renewable energy produced on-site: solar
collectors (primary energy) | 78 348 kWh |
Renewable energy produced on-site: PV
technology (primary energy) | 157 160 kWh |
Total energy uses nZEB
Criteria (Primary energy) (kWh/m².y) | 10.14 |
For this most ambitious project of the
Social Housing Agency, 2 477 000 € are invested (excluding tax)
for retrofit intervention, 108 000 € to replace solar collectors and
172 000 € for the PV installation (wood frame and panels). Apart from
the income with selling kWh produced through PV system to the French
Electricity Company (EDF), the cost for energy operation of the building will
be about 15 k€ per year whereas it reached 43 k€ per year before
retrofit intervention, corresponding to annual savings of 28 k€.
Follow us on social media accounts to stay up to date with REHVA actualities
0