Stay Informed
Follow us on social media accounts to stay up to date with REHVA actualities
Keywords: ceiling fan, airflow distribution, air movement, thermal comfort, office layout, low-energy cooling
|
|
|
Wei Wei* | A.C. Boerstra | A. Luna Navarro |
Faculty of Architecture and Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands and ABT BV, Delft, The Netherlandsweiwei3748@gmail.com | Faculty of Architecture and Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands | Faculty of Architecture and Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands |
* Wei Wei from Delft University of Technologywas awarded Third Prize in the 2026 REHVA student competition for his thesis “Office Desks as Diffuser of Ceiling Fan Airflow and Collective Comfort”. | ||
Overheating in offices is becoming increasingly common due to climate change and improved insulation. Conventional air conditioning can maintain comfort, but it requires substantial energy and contributes to peak electricity demand, particularly during warm periods.
Ceiling fans offer a promising low-energy alternative. By increasing air movement, they enhance heat loss from the human body and improve thermal perception at higher indoor temperatures. This allows indoor setpoints to be increased without compromising perceived comfort, reducing the need for energy-intensive cooling systems.
However, the effectiveness of ceiling fans in real office environments is not determined by the fan alone. Air movement patterns are strongly influenced by the spatial configuration of the room, including the presence of desks, partitions, and occupants. In shared office environments, where multiple people rely on the same airflow source, understanding how air is distributed becomes particularly important.
This raises a key question: can a single ceiling fan provide acceptable conditions for multiple occupants in a furnished office?
Furniture is often assumed to obstruct airflow and reduce air movement in the occupied zone. However, this study shows that desks can significantly modify airflow patterns in a beneficial way.
CFD simulation results (Figure 1) show that Without desks, airflow from the ceiling fan forms a concentrated downward jet beneath the fan blades. After reaching the floor surface, the airflow spreads horizontally slightly above floor level. While this creates air movement near the floor, it results in relatively low air speeds at seated height, where cooling is more effective for occupants than at ankle height.

Figure 1. Airflow pattern from a ceiling fan without and with desks. The downward jet is intercepted by the desk surface and redirected at seated height, shifting airflow from the floor to the occupied zone.
When desks are placed beneath the fan, this airflow pattern changes significantly. The downward jet is intercepted by the desk surface and redirected horizontally at 0.85 m height (slightly above the desk surface), corresponding to the torso level of seated occupants. This process effectively lifts the airflow from the floor into the occupied zone.
Measurements confirm this effect. Air speed at torso height increases by approximately 200% (Figure 2) when desks are present compared to the empty room. Rather than blocking airflow, desks act as passive diffusers that redistribute air movement across the seating area and enhance its effectiveness for cooling.

Figure 2. Measured air speed at 0.85 m height with and without desks. The presence of desks increases air movement in the occupied zone by approximately 200%.
To understand how these airflow changes affect occupants, human subject experiments were conducted at approximately 28°C, representing an indoor condition commonly perceived as too warm.
Increasing air speed resulted in a clear shift in thermal sensation from slightly warm toward neutral conditions, indicating that air movement effectively reduces the perception of warmth at elevated temperatures. High levels of thermal acceptability were observed across all tested conditions (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Thermal sensation (left) and acceptability (right). Increasing air movement shifts thermal sensation toward neutral conditions while maintaining high levels of acceptability.
The most favourable condition (acceptability 96%) occurred at a seat-average air speed of approximately 0.49 m/s, achieved with a total fan power consumption of only 7.2 W. This corresponds to a very low energy use per occupant, highlighting the efficiency of fan-based cooling strategies.
However, increased air movement did not necessarily translate into improved overall comfort. While higher air speeds reduced the sensation of warmth, they were also associated with reports of local draft. This suggests that comfort in shared environments depends on balancing sufficient air movement with the risk of draft discomfort, rather than simply maximizing air speed.
To support practical application, a simplified concept termed Diffusion Power was introduced. This parameter describes how much of the air movement generated by the fan is effectively transferred to the occupied zone (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Diffusion Power concept and its relationship with distance from the fan centre. Approximately one-third of the initial fan-generated air speed reaches the occupied zone, enabling estimation of air speed at seating positions.
The results show that approximately one-third of the initial fan-generated air speed is maintained at seating level. This value is relatively consistent across different fan speeds and provides a useful indication of how effectively airflow is redistributed by the desk configuration.
Further analysis shows that diffusion power varies with the distance from the fan centre. As a result, air speed at different seating positions can be estimated using simple geometric relationships based on fan specifications and layout geometry.
Although this approach is based on a specific configuration, it demonstrates how airflow distribution can be approximated during early design stages. This can support designers in identifying zones of higher and lower air movement and in making informed decisions about desk placement and fan positioning.
This study demonstrates that office desks can significantly influence how airflow from ceiling fans is distributed within a space. By redirecting the downward airflow toward seated height, desks increase air movement in the occupied zone and expand the area over which a single fan can effectively provide air movement.
At 28°C, acceptable conditions can be achieved with very low energy use when sufficient air movement is provided. This highlights the potential of ceiling fans as a low-energy solution for improving indoor environmental conditions in office buildings.
The findings also show that effective cooling is not only about increasing air speed, but about how airflow is distributed within the space. By combining ceiling fans with thoughtful desk layouts, designers can create comfortable, energy-efficient, and climate-resilient office environments that are better adapted to future overheating challenges.
T. Psomas, P. Heiselberg, K. Duer, and E. Bjørn, “Overheating risk barriers to energy renovations of single family houses: Multicriteria analysis and assessment,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 117, pp. 138–148, 2016.
M. André, S. Schiavon, and R. Lamberts, “Implementation of desk fans in open office: Lessons learned and guidelines from a field study,” Building and Environment, vol. 259, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111681
Arens, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Moving air for comfort. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279556483
E. Arens and H. Zhang, “Moving air for comfort,” 2009. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279556483
L. Huang, Q. Ouyang, Y. Zhu, and L. Jiang, “A study about the demand for air movement in warm environment,” Building and Environment, vol. 61, pp. 27–33, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.12.002
Y. Zhai, E. Arens, K. Elsworth, and H. Zhang, “Selecting air speeds for cooling at sedentary and non-sedentary office activity levels,” Building and Environment, vol. 122, pp. 247–257, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.06.027
Y. Zhai, H. Zhang, Y. Zhang, W. Pasut, E. Arens, and Q. Meng, “Comfort under personally controlled air movement in warm and humid environments,” Building and Environment, vol. 65, pp. 109–117, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.03.022
Y. Zhai, Y. Zhang, H. Zhang, W. Pasut, E. Arens, and Q. Meng, “Human comfort and perceived air quality in warm and humid environments with ceiling fans,” Building and Environment, vol. 90, pp. 178–185, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.04.003
F. Tartarini, S. Schiavon, O. Jay, E. Arens, and C. Huizenga, “Application of Gagge’s energy balance model to determine humidity-dependent temperature thresholds for healthy adults using electric fans during heatwaves,” Building and Environment, vol. 207, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108437
Y. Gao et al., “Ceiling fan air speeds around desks and office partitions,” Building and Environment, vol. 124, pp. 412–440, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.08.029
M. Luo et al., “Detailed measured air speed distribution in four commercial buildings with ceiling fans,” Building and Environment, vol. 200, p. 107979, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107979
E. Present, P. Raftery, G. Brager, and L. T. Graham, “Ceiling fans in commercial buildings: In situ airspeeds & practitioner experience,” Building and Environment, vol. 147, pp. 241–257, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.10.012
A. Lipczynska, S. Schiavon, and L. T. Graham, “Thermal comfort and self-reported productivity in an office with ceiling fans in the tropics,” Building and Environment, vol. 135, pp. 202–212, May 2018, doi: 10.1016/J.BUILDENV.2018.03.013
P. Raftery et al., “Ceiling fans: Predicting indoor air speeds based on full scale laboratory measurements,” Building and Environment, vol. 155, pp. 210–223, May 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.03.040
Follow us on social media accounts to stay up to date with REHVA actualities
0