Stay Informed
Follow us on social media accounts to stay up to date with REHVA actualities
Boris LubinskiGFW | energy
efficiency associationfor heating,
cooling, chpStresemannallee 3060596 Frankfurt/Mainb.lubinski@agfw.dehttp://www.agfw.de |
The vast
majority of district energy systems are district heating systems. So the
standard is primarily written for heating systems. But there are also district
cooling systems in Europe that are now in the scope of this revised standard.
In some cases, there is an efficiency improvement or renewable energy potential
that can only be realized on local or district level. So the European
Commission asked for methods that facilitate the assessment of small district
electricity systems. Thus the former district heating standard evolved to a
more general standard with universal calculation methods applicable to various
energy carriers.
The
district energy system is regarded as a black box (see Figures 1 and 2). The energy performance indicators are determined as the ratio of
weighted energy input to the system and energy delivered from the system.
| |||||||||||||||||||
Figure 1.
Single-output district
energy system as a black box. |
(1) | |
where fwe;des weighting factor of the district energy
system; | |
Ein;cr energy content of input to the system of
energy carrier cr; | |
fwe;cr weighting factor of energy carrier cr; | |
Edel delivered energy; | |
Weighting
factor means e.g. primary energy factor or emission factor. |
Multi-output
generation systems like cogeneration units or tri-generation of heating,
cooling and electricity deliver more than one energy carrier. The energy
carriers can be delivered to the same area or a different area or to another
energy system. If the energy carriers are delivered to different areas or
different systems, the exported weighted energy is counted as a bonus (see Figure 2). It represents the avoided production in the external system or area.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Figure 2. Multi-output district energy system with
exported energy. |
(2) | |
where Eexp energy exported to an external system or
area; | |
fwe;exp weighting factor of the exported energy; |
As long as
the system boundaries are clearly defined and all energy carriers that cross
the system boundary are considered, the black box approach leads to reasonable
results. (Exception: district heating system exporting much electricity from
non-cogeneration mode).
District
energy systems are supplied with energy from other energy systems. The required
weighting factors of these systems can be calculated with the same black box
approach. But in many cases this calculation is not possible due to lack of
information. Therefore, the standard provides a set of default values that can
always be used instead of calculating. Figure 3 illustrates an example for a coal
power plant outside the assessment boundary that delivers heat to the district
heating system. This external heat delivery is weighted with the default value
fPnren = 0,8. Though calculating system
specific indicators is more accurate than using default values, the set of
default values is a helpful means of appropriate simplification for complex
tasks.
Figure 3.
An example of a coal power plant outside the assessment boundary that delivers
heat to the district heating system.
Follow us on social media accounts to stay up to date with REHVA actualities
0