Stay Informed
Follow us on social media accounts to stay up to date with REHVA actualities
|
Boris LubinskiGFW | energy efficiency associationfor heating, cooling, chpStresemannallee 3060596 Frankfurt/Mainb.lubinski@agfw.dehttp://www.agfw.de |
The vast majority of district energy systems are district heating systems. So the standard is primarily written for heating systems. But there are also district cooling systems in Europe that are now in the scope of this revised standard. In some cases, there is an efficiency improvement or renewable energy potential that can only be realized on local or district level. So the European Commission asked for methods that facilitate the assessment of small district electricity systems. Thus the former district heating standard evolved to a more general standard with universal calculation methods applicable to various energy carriers.
The district energy system is regarded as a black box (see Figures 1 and 2). The energy performance indicators are determined as the ratio of weighted energy input to the system and energy delivered from the system.
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
Figure 1. Single-output district energy system as a black box. | |||||||||||||||||||
| (1) |
where fwe;des weighting factor of the district energy system; | |
Ein;cr energy content of input to the system of energy carrier cr; | |
fwe;cr weighting factor of energy carrier cr; | |
Edel delivered energy; | |
Weighting factor means e.g. primary energy factor or emission factor. | |
Multi-output generation systems like cogeneration units or tri-generation of heating, cooling and electricity deliver more than one energy carrier. The energy carriers can be delivered to the same area or a different area or to another energy system. If the energy carriers are delivered to different areas or different systems, the exported weighted energy is counted as a bonus (see Figure 2). It represents the avoided production in the external system or area.
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Figure 2. Multi-output district energy system with exported energy. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (2) |
where Eexp energy exported to an external system or area; | |
fwe;exp weighting factor of the exported energy; | |
As long as the system boundaries are clearly defined and all energy carriers that cross the system boundary are considered, the black box approach leads to reasonable results. (Exception: district heating system exporting much electricity from non-cogeneration mode).
District energy systems are supplied with energy from other energy systems. The required weighting factors of these systems can be calculated with the same black box approach. But in many cases this calculation is not possible due to lack of information. Therefore, the standard provides a set of default values that can always be used instead of calculating. Figure 3 illustrates an example for a coal power plant outside the assessment boundary that delivers heat to the district heating system. This external heat delivery is weighted with the default value fPnren = 0,8. Though calculating system specific indicators is more accurate than using default values, the set of default values is a helpful means of appropriate simplification for complex tasks.

Figure 3. An example of a coal power plant outside the assessment boundary that delivers heat to the district heating system.
Follow us on social media accounts to stay up to date with REHVA actualities
0