Stay Informed
Follow us on social media accounts to stay up to date with REHVA actualities
Elena FuentesPhD, Head of Laboratory at Catalonia Institute
for Energy Research, IREC, | David WaddicorPhD, Research Scientist at Catalonia Institute
for Energy Research, IREC, | JaumeSalomPhD, Head of Thermal Energy and Performance
Group, IREC, |
Due to the
lack of modulation available, fixed-capacity heat pumps present the issue that
they will cycle between on and off states in order to match the required load
demand. This behavior entails parasitic losses during the stand-by and start-up
phases of operation of the equipment, thus reducing their energy performance. Commonly, international rating standards estimate
a coefficient of performance (COP or EER) at part load for fixed-capacity units
using a correction parameter, called partial load factor (PLF), that is
applied on the performance coefficient at steady state conditions to obtain its
value at part load as:
(1) |
The
American standard ASHRAE 116-1995 [1] characterizes the part load operation of fixed-capacity
heat pumps by determining a cyclic degradation coefficient Cd, which
is derived in a dynamic test, as defined in the ARI standard 210/240 [2]. In
the ASHRAE 116-1995 and ARI 210/240 standards the partial load factor is calculated
as:
(2) |
where the
degradation coefficient Cd can be determined experimentally or take
a default value of 0.25.
The
European standard EN14825 [3], analogously, calculates the efficiency at
partial load from the correction of the performance at steady state as obtained
with the standard EN14511 testing method [4]. For air sourced systems the
partial load factor correction in EN14825 is identical to (2). For the case of
water-to-water heat pumps with fixed capacity the efficiency correction is
based on energy losses associated to parasitical electrical energy consumption
at stand-by. The correction for these systems is based on the degradation
coefficient Cc and is defined with the following correlation:
(3) |
Figure 1.
Experimental set-up.
The EN14825
standard allows using the above equation with a default value of Cc=0.9
or with a value determined from the measurement of the electrical power
consumption at stand-by.
On the
other hand, the Italian standard UNI 10963 [5] proposes an expression for the partial load
factor defined as:
(4) |
The above
correlation can be applied with data obtained from a single experiment at part
load that allows determining the coefficients a and b in equation (4). This approach has
been tested by Betannini et al. [6] with good results
for a number of heat pumps.
The general
calculation method in standards ASHRAE 116-1995/ARI 210/240 and EN14825 for deriving
heat pump annual performance rating consists on applying the so-called bin
method, in which a seasonal coefficient of performance (SCOP or SEER) is
calculated for a whole year, under a load profile defined at different climatic
conditions.
Laboratory
experiments were conducted to assess the behavior of a 40.5 kW heating capacity
water-to-water heat pump in a laboratory setting. The heat pump was tested in a
semi-virtual environment that allowed its operation while connected to a virtual
storage tank and heating load. The virtual system was created with the software
TRNSYS. The temperatures and flows of water circulating to and from the heat
pump were emulated in the hydraulic test benches of the laboratory in order to
operate the heat pump dynamically as in real conditions (Figure 1).
The results
of partial load factor obtained from experiments at different water storage
volumes and partial load ratios (PLR) are shown in Figure 2A. The results show degradation in the energy efficiency for
decreasing partial load ratio, with a more important effect for low storage
size conditions. The stand-by losses for the heat pump under study were found
to be negligible for PLR>0.2, the reason being that the stand-by power consumption for this heat
pump is 15 W, only a 0.2% of its nominal electrical power. The main source
of efficiency degradation is identified after a close analysis of the transient
test data (Figure 2B). A significant performance loss is
found during start-up, resulting from the thermal capacity reaching its maximum
value only after 42–60 s from the onset of start-up, while the electrical
power consumption reaches its full value in less than 20 s. This behavior,
which was consistently observed at any inertia and load duty conditions, provides
evidence that significant start-up losses may occur for this water-to-water
heat pump. This efficiency loss, however, is neglected in the European standard
EN14825 for fixed-capacity water-to-water systems.
Figure 2.
A) Influence of water storage volume on partial load factor B) heat pump
start-up (orange: COP, green: electrical power consumption).
Different
correlations in the cited standards to estimate the partial load factor were
compared with results for the 50 L storage experiment, as shown in Figure 3. The predictions from UNI10963 and EN14825 correlations for water-to-water
heat pumps substantially deviate from the experiments, while the estimations by
the ARI standard (equation (2) is close to the experimental data with Cd=0.22.
However, extrapolation of the data to PLR=0 obtained from polynomial fitting
analysis (equation fitted to experiments in Figure 3) shows that the ARI standard does
not account for the drop in the performance for PLR<0.2, produced by
stand-by parasitic effects.
An
alternative equation for calculation of the partial load factor is proposed
here that is able to account for both stand-by and start-up losses. This
equation, which is derived theoretically using the definition of partial load
factor by Corberán et al. (2013) [7] is defined as:
(5) |
This
correlation reduces to equation (2) when stand-by losses are negligible and to
expression (3) when start-up losses are negligible. The use of this equation (Figure 3) provides a better estimation of the partial load factor when compared
with the line fitted to experiments with respect to the other approaches.
Equation
(5) can be used to derive the COP value at part load conditions, once the
coefficients Cc and Cd are known. A reduced
experimentation method is proposed here to derive these coefficients. The value
of Cc can readily be obtained from stand-by measurements as
described in EN14825. Then, the value of Cd can be derived from a
single experiment at intermediate partial load (eg.
PLR≈0.4) by solving equation (5) for Cd,
with all the other parameters known.
Figure 4 shows values of partial load factor
obtained with this proposed new reduced experimentation method in comparison
with the reduced method based on the UNI method and the curve fitted to
experiments.
Figure 3.
Comparison of experimental data and predictions from parameterizations for 50 L
storage inertia conditions.
The UNI
method achieves good agreement for storage volume of 1000 L, but it deviates
from real degradation as the storage size is reduced. On the other hand, the
new method proposed here is able to predict the partial load factor quite
closely to the equation fitted to experiments at any inertia conditions.
In this
section the bin calculation method described in the EN14825 standard [3] for
estimating the yearly COP is applied to assess the validity of different methodologies determining the heat pump partial load. The bin
method is based on the integration of the energy consumed during a year at
three different climate conditions with outdoor design temperatures of -22°C (colder), -10°C (average) and 2°C (warmer).
The results
of the calculations are presented in Figure 5, where the heat pump annual COP (COPnet) is represented as obtained from using different
methods, namely, 1) the UNI standard reduced experimentation method, 2) the new
method proposed in the present study, and 3) the EN14825 standard correlations
for water-to-water heat pumps with Cc=0.9 (default value) and Cc=0.998
(as determined from stand-by measurements).
Figure 4.
Predictions of partial load factor using the reduced method in UNI standard and
the proposed new method for inertia conditions with (A) 50 L, (B) 100 L and (C)
1000 L.
Results in Figure 5 show that the estimation of the annual COP is sensitive to the storage
volume conditions. This implies that the energy performance is dependent not
only on the equipment but also on the configuration of a particular system in a
building. Hence, similar inertia conditions are required for comparison
purposes between equipment. Calculations from using the EN14825 correlations
deviate from experiments in as much as 12%, depending on the inertia
conditions.
At 1000 L
storage conditions the EN14825 standard prediction with Cc=0.998 leads to a small deviation of 3.5%, confirming that this method is
reliable for inertia conditions high enough to yield start-up effects negligible. Similarly, the UNI method deviates from real
performance as the inertia is reduced, with acceptable predictions for the 1 000 L.
Figure 5.
Calculations of SCOPnet with bin method defined in
EN14825 standard for different approaches.
An
experimental analysis of the performance at part load of a water-to-water heat
pump has shown that these systems may exhibit significant start-up losses and not
only stand-by losses as considered in the European standard EN14825. On the
other hand, significant sensitivity of equipment performance was found to the
water storage configuration. An assessment of existing methods in standards
indicated deviations from real part load performance for decreasing inertia
conditions. In order to improve this aspect a new reduced experimentation and
correlation method is proposed that is able to characterize the real yearly
performance of water-to-water heat pumps with inclusion of the inertia
conditions and their effects on stand-by and start-up efficiency losses.
[1] ASHRAE Standard 116-1995, Method of Testing for
Rating Seasonal Efficiency of Unitary Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps, American
Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-conditioning Engineers, Inc.
(ASHRAE), 1791 Tullie Circle, NE., Atlanta, GA 30329, U.S.A.
[2] ARI standard 210/240, Unitary
air-conditioning and air-source heat pump equipment, Air Conditioning &
Refrigeration Institute, Arlington, Virginia, 1989.
[3] EN 14825, Air conditioners, liquid chilling
packages and heat pumps, with electrically driven compressors, for space
heating and cooling. Testing and rating at part load conditions and calculation
of seasonal performance.
[4] EN 14511 – Air conditioners, liquid chilling
packages and heat pumps with electrically driven compressors for space heating
and cooling.
[5] UNI standard 10963 “Air conditioners,
chillers and heat pumps. Determination of the part load performances”.
[6] E. Bettanini, A. Gastaldello, L. Schibuola,
Simplified models to simulate part load performances of air conditioning equipments,in: 8th International
IBPSA conference, Eindhoven, Netherland, 2003.
[7] Corberán, J. M., Donadello, D., Martínez-Galván
I., Montagud C. Partialization
losses of ON/OFF operation of water-to-water refrigeration/heat-pump units, International Journal of Refrigeration, 36 (8) (2013)
2251–2261.
Follow us on social media accounts to stay up to date with REHVA actualities
0