Stay Informed
Follow us on social media accounts to stay up to date with REHVA actualities
M. J. RomeroUniversidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Elche, SpainETRES Consultores,
Elche, SpainTel.: +34 965455129mromero@etresconsultores.com | P. V. QuilesUniversidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Elche, SpainTel.: +34 966658561pedro.vicente@umh.es |
The update
of the Spanish building regulation “DB-HE”, which must be finally approved
during the year 2018, will be the second review of energy saving requirements
that will occur since the first version was published in 2006. This new version
of the DB-HE will incorporate the nZEB requirements
into the Spanish regulation.
The new
requirements are defined within a set of indicators that are based on the
standard EN ISO 52000-1, the building that complies with the limits
established for each of these indicators will be considered as nZEB.
The
standard EN ISO 52000-1 indicators focus on four blocks:
·
First
indicator: The building envelope (energy needs or energy demand).
·
Second
indicator: The total primary energy use.
·
Third
indicator: Non-renewable primary energy use without compensation between energy
carriers.
·
Fourth
indicator: Numerical indicator of non-renewable primary energy use with
compensation.
The first
three indicators are incorporated into the Spanish new DB-HE, leaving the
fourth indicator for its development in future regulations.
In this
article we analyse various alternatives applied to a real single-family
dwelling, both in the envelope of the building and in its facilities
(production of domestic hot water, heating and cooling).
The
criterion that has been followed to determine energy improvement strategies
follows the following principles:
·
The
strategies should not imply a significant increase in the construction cost.
·
The
strategies should not imply a significant modification of the constructive
systems that are currently used.
In summary,
we look for strategies that have an easy and fast implementation in the
building sector in Spain, trying to create the feeling in the promoters of new
buildings that nZEB is a feasible objective to
achieve.
This
analysis is based on a single-family house that is currently on definition
phase. The house is close to a group of similar houses which are currently on
construction. They are located on the north coast of the province of Alicante
(climatic zone B4), with 150.17 m² living space distributed over two
floors, ground floor with 54.29 m² and first floor with 95.88 m².
Figure 1.
Drawings of the analysed dwelling.
Figure 2.
Exterior of similar homes to the analysed one built in the same development.
The thermal
envelope of the building consists of the elements presented in Table 1.
Table 1. Description of the thermal envelope of the building.
Façades (layers from outside to
inside) | U = 0.28 W/(m²·K) | |||
Cement mortar | 1.5 cm |
| ||
Concrete block (load bearing walls) | 20 cm | |||
Mineral wool – 0.034 W/m·K | 5 + 5 cm | |||
Double air brick | 7 cm | |||
Gypsum plaster | 1.5 cm | |||
Roofs (layers from outside to
inside) | U = 0.20 W/(m²·K) | |||
Gravel + geotextile | 5 cm | |||
Extruded polystyrene – 0.034 W/m·K | 5 + 5 + 5 cm | |||
Geotextile + waterproofing | 0.4 cm | |||
Light weight concrete | 7 cm | |||
Unidirectional slab with concrete blocks | 25 cm | |||
Gypsum plaster | 1.5 cm | |||
Interior floor (layers from outside
to inside) | U = 0.96 W/(m²·K) | |||
Stoneware | 1.5 cm |
| ||
Cement mortar | 4 cm | |||
Expanded polystyrene (underfloor heating) – 0.039 W/m·K | 2 cm | |||
Unidirectional slab with concrete blocks | 25 cm | |||
Inside wall. Conditioning to not
conditioning spaces | U = 0.47 W/(m²·K) | |||
Concrete block (load bearing walls) | 20 cm | |||
Mineral wool – 0.034 W/m·K | 5 cm | |||
Double air brick | 7 cm | |||
Gypsum plaster | 1.5 cm | |||
The windows
have aluminum frames with thermal break, U = 3.20 W/(m²·K) and
low emissive glasses, U = 1.80 W/(m²·K) (thermal transmission coefficient) and
g = 64% (solar
factor).
Regarding
the definition of the encounters between the different enclosures that produce
thermal bridges, and taking into account the constructive typology of the
façade formed by double brick with an isolated air chamber, it has been
considered:
·
Slab
penetrating a wall (façade) and encounter between wall and roof: thermal
insulation not continuous.
·
Pillar:
there are no pillars (load bearing walls).
·
Encounter
between façade and external floor: thermal insulation above slab.
·
Contour
of the window: small separation between the thermal insulation of the façade
and the window frames.
·
Encounter
between façade and floor above ground: thermal insulation not continuous.
Regarding
the installations, the project has an air-water heat pump for the supply of
both domestic hot water and heating (underfloor heating) and cooling (fan
coils). At EUROVENT nominal conditions, the air-water heat pump has a nominal
performance in heat mode COP of 4.29 and in cold mode the SEER seasonal average
is 3.04. There is no solar thermal installation for domestic hot water. The
ventilation is produced by an impulse / extraction system with a heat
recovery of an efficiency of 77%.
This study
has been done using the software “Unified Tool LIDER – CALENER, HULC 2018
(Spanish acronym), version 1.5.1743.1155 of July 19, 2018. HULC is the Spanish
official building energy certification tool used for the thermal energy demand
assessment. This version of the HULC tool is included in the draft of the DB-HE
2018, which, as indicated above, includes the indicators for the nZEB buildings. It is important to highlight that the HULC
tool follows a transitory calculation and hourly base assessment that has been
validated through BESTEST and has been used in many recently published studies.
For the
analysis of the thermal bridges that arise in Case 2, the THERM Finite
Element Simulator has been used in its latest version 7.6.01 (version date 17
November 2017). THERM is developed by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
(LBNL) to model two-dimensional heat transfer effects and is based on the
finite element method and meets the requirements indicated in the UNE-EN ISO 10211
standard "Thermal bridges in buildings. Heat flows and surface
temperatures".
In the
analysis carried out, six cases are presented:
·
Case 1:
This is the starting situation in which the solutions described in the previous
section are applied.
·
Case 2:
Starting from Case 1, it includes the necessary measures to comply with
the parameter of the global heat transfer coefficient of the thermal envelope
K.
·
Case 3:
From Case 2, the necessary measures are added to comply with the solar
control parameter of the thermal envelope, qsol; Cases 2 and 3 allow compliance
with the energy demand indicator.
·
Case 4:
From Case 3, the necessary measures are included so that the building
complies with both the total primary energy indicator and the non-renewable
primary energy indicator.
From Case 4,
the building complies with the Spanish nZEB
requirements and, therefore, it is a Nearly Zero Energy Building.
To
complement the research, two variations are made in the domestic hot water,
heating and cooling installations according to the following:
·
Case 5:
Solar thermal solar installation and air/water heat pump for domestic hot water
production and air/air heat pump for heating and cooling.
·
Case 6:
Photovoltaic solar installation and air /water heat pump for domestic hot water
production and air/air heat pump for heating and cooling.
The results
obtained with each of the six cases analysed are shown below. In addition, the
limit values established in the DB-HE 2018 draft form the indicators that
define a NZEB are shown.
Table 2. Results obtained in Case 1.
Energy Demand | Energy Class | ||
Heating kWh/(m²·year) | Cooling kWh/(m²·year) | CO2 emissions Kg CO2/(m²·year) | Non-Renewable Primary Energy Consumption. kWh/(m²·year) |
12.80 | 19.80 | 5.30 - “A” | 31.20 - “B” |
Firstindicator Energy Demand | Secondindicator Total Primary Energy Consumption | Thirdindicator Non-Renewable Primary Energy Consumption | |
K = 0.68 > 0.58 Fails | qsol;jul= 17.03 ≤ 2 Fails | 51.20 ≤ 56 Comply | 31.20 ≤ 28 Comply |
The
envelope global heat transfer coefficient, K depends on three main components:
opaque parts (façades, roofs, outside floors and floors above the ground),
windows and thermal bridges. The analysis of the contribution of each one of
these three components on the total value will show us where to start the
improvement process. The result is: 39% for opaque parts; 30% for windows and
31% for thermal bridges.
Given that the
opaque part is already well insulated, with insulation thicknesses of 10 cm
on façades and 15 cm on the roof, the analysis was focussed on thermal
bridges: the reduction of the façade encounter with flat roofs is proposed,
since in that encounter the highest energy losses are produced (54% of the
total). It is proposed to replace the concrete blocks of the unidirectional
slab by EPS expanded polystyrene blocks obtaining a linear thermal
transmittance value, determined with THERM Software, of 0.18 W/m·K (much lower than the standard value of 0.92 W/m·K).
Table 3. Results obtained in Case 2.
Energy Demand | Energy Class | ||
Heating kWh/(m²·year) | Cooling kWh/(m²·year) | CO2 emissions Kg CO2/(m²·year) | Non-Renewable Primary Energy Consumption. kWh/(m²·year) |
9.8 | 19.4 | 4.9 - “A” | 28.9 - “A” |
Firstindicator Energy Demand | Secondindicator Total Primary Energy Consumption | Thirdindicator Non-Renewable Primary Energy Consumption | |
K = 0.57 ≤ 0.58 Comply | qsol;jul= 17.03 ≤ 2 Comply | 47.6 ≤ 56 Comply | 28.9 ≤ 28 Comply |
The solar
control of the thermal envelope depends on the solar gains, for July 15th, through all windows with the solar
protections activated. Therefore, it is proposed to incorporate blinds to all
windows (except those in the toilet rooms) and an awning in the window of the
living - dining room. The standard EN ISO 52033-1 has been applied to
determine the coefficient ggl; sh; wi (total energy transmittance through a glass).
Table 4. Results obtained in Case 3.
Energy Demand | Energy Class | ||
Heating kWh/(m²·year) | Cooling kWh/(m²·year) | CO2 emissions Kg CO2/(m²·year) | Non-Renewable Primary Energy Consumption. kWh/(m²·year) |
9.8 | 19.4 | 4.9 - “A” | 28.9 - “A” |
Firstindicator Energy Demand | Secondindicator Total Primary Energy Consumption | Thirdindicator Non-Renewable Primary Energy Consumption | |
K = 0.57 ≤ 0.58 Comply | qsol;jul= 2≤ 2 Comply | 47.6 ≤ 56 Comply | 28.9 ≤ 28 Comply |
Case 3
shows that the building is very close to comply all nZEB
requirements. As it can be seen in the house drawings (Figure 1),
the larger windows are oriented to the West, reducing the absorption of solar
radiation in winter. It was proposed to change the orientation of the main
bedroom room from West to South.
Table 5. Results obtained in Case 4.
Energy Demand | Energy Class | ||
Heating kWh/(m²·year) | Cooling kWh/(m²·year) | CO2 emissions Kg CO2/(m²·year) | Non-Renewable Primary Energy Consumption. kWh/(m²·year) |
8.5 | 19.1 | 4.6 - “A” | 27.2 - “A” |
Firstindicator Energy Demand | Secondindicator Total Primary Energy Consumption | Thirdindicator Non-Renewable Primary Energy Consumption | |
K = 0.57 ≤ 0.58 Comply | qsol;jul= 1.96 ≤
2 Comply | 44.90 ≤ 56 Comply | 27.2 ≤ 28 Comply |
Facilities
are now modified: domestic hot water through solar thermal (annual solar
coverage of 77.2%) and air-water heat pump (COP under EUROVENT conditions of
3.19); Air conditioning by autonomous air-to-air heat pump (EUROVENT COP 4.28
and EER 3.75). This case does not require the modification of the window
orientation proposed in Case 4.
Table 6. Results obtained in Case 5.
Energy Demand | Energy Class | ||
Heating kWh/(m²·year) | Cooling kWh/(m²·year) | CO2 emissions Kg CO2/(m²·year) | Non-Renewable Primary Energy Consumption. kWh/(m²·year) |
9.8 | 19.4 | 4.3 - “A” | 25.4 - “A” |
Firstindicator Energy Demand | Secondindicator Total Primary Energy Consumption | Thirdindicator Non-Renewable Primary Energy Consumption | |
K = 0.57 ≤ 0.58 Comply | qsol;jul= 2 ≤ 2 Comply | 52.0 ≤ 56 Comply | 25.4 ≤ 28 Comply |
Facilities
are modified: domestic hot water through photovoltaic solar installation
(annual production of 432 kWh/year) and air to water heat pump (EUROVENT
nominal COP = 3.19). Air conditioning by autonomous air to air heat pump
(EUROVENT nominal COP = 4.28 and EER = 3.75). This case needs the modification
of the window indicated in Case 4.
Table 7. Results obtained in Case 6.
Energy Demand | Energy Class | ||
Heating kWh/(m²·year) | Cooling kWh/(m²·year) | CO2 emissions Kg CO2/(m²·year) | Non-Renewable Primary Energy Consumption. kWh/(m²·year) |
8.4 | 19.1 | 5.1 - “A” | 24.5 - “A” |
Firstindicator Energy Demand | Secondindicator Total Primary Energy Consumption | Thirdindicator Non-Renewable Primary Energy Consumption | |
K = 0.57 ≤ 0.58 Comply | qsol;jul= 1.96 ≤ 2 Comply | 49.6 ≤ 56 Comply | 24.5 ≤ 28 Comply |
It has been
demonstrated that it is possible to achieve the requirements established in the
latest version of the Spanish definition of nZEB,
applying strategies that neither imply a significant increase in the
construction costs nor a significant modification of the construction systems
that are currently used.
Once the
building is properly insulated according to current Spanish requirements,
incorporating solutions to minimize thermal bridges, installing solar
protection systems such as blinds and analysing the correct orientation of the
windows, it will be possible to meet the nZEB
requirements published in the last draft.
On the
other hand, a comparison between different facilities is provided in Table 8 (Cases 4, 5 and 6), which is interesting because there are significant
differences in energy consumption.
Table 8. Comparison between Cases 4, 5 and 6.
Case | Primary Energy Consumption [kWh/(m²·year)] | ||
Total | Renewable | Non-Renewable | |
Case 4. Air to water heat pump for domestic hot water production, heating and cooling | 44.90 | 17.70 | 27.20 |
Case 5. Solar thermal installation and air to water heat pump for DHW production and air to air heat pump for heating and cooling | 52.00 | 26.60 | 25.40 |
Case 6. Photovoltaic solar installation and air to water heat pump for DHW production and air to air heat pump for heating and cooling | 49.60 | 25.10 | 24.50 |
Draft of the“Documento Básico de Ahorro de Energía DB-HE 2018” (www.codigotecnico.org)
Draft of the “DA DB-HE/1 Cálculo de los parámetros característicos de la envolvente” (www.codigotecnico.org)
Unified Tool LIDER – CALENER HULC 2018 (www.codigotecnico.org)
THERM Finite Element Simulator (https://windows.lbl.gov/software/therm)
UNE-EN ISO 52022-1: 2017. Energy performance of buildings - Thermal, solar and daylight properties of building components and elements - Part 1: Simplified calculation method of the solar and daylight characteristics for solar protection devices combined with glazing (ISO 52022-1:2017).
Follow us on social media accounts to stay up to date with REHVA actualities
0