Stay Informed
Follow us on social media accounts to stay up to date with REHVA actualities
Key words: refrigerants, CFCs, HCFCs, HFCs, natural refrigerants, ODP, GWP |
The second
part of the refrigerant paper deals with the refrigerant development throughout
the history, which took place due to different reasons, such as safety,
stability, durability, economic or environmental issues, thus giving the boost
to new research and equipment improvement in terms of safety and efficiency.
Recent legislation worldwide and in the EU is still not quite completed
concerning refrigerant issues. The delicate subject of refrigerants is widely discussed,
viewpoints of different parties are opposite, depending on positions and
interests, and compliance on that issue is not easy to achieve. The chance for
“closing the circle” and return to natural refrigerants exists and should not
be missed.
Beginnings of mechanical refrigeration,
starting from early 19th century are characterized by use of natural
refrigerants. Water and air were the first refrigerants considered for use in
mechanical refrigeration systems. In 1834 Perkins proposed ethyl ether as the
working fluid in his patent of the vapor - compression refrigeration system.
Perkins system was a closed circuit comprising all the modern vapor-compression
system components: the compressor, the condenser, the expansion device and the
evaporator. By that time ammonia, sulfur dioxide and carbon dioxide had been
isolated and were available for use as well. The first one who used methyl
ether, which operated at higher pressure and thus reduced the risk of drawing
air into the system and forming an explosive mixture within the machine was Tellier in 1863. First
ammonia compressor for refrigerating purposes was designed and constructed by
Boyle in 1872, and 4 years later Linde designed the
first machine working with ammonia. In 1862 Lowe developed a carbon-dioxide
refrigerating system. Carbon dioxide has very low toxicity but required
high-pressure machinery and was difficult to use because of its low critical
temperature (31,6oC) which does not allow for condensation in many
situations. Methyl chloride was used for the first time as a refrigerant in
1878. Most of those early refrigerants were flammable, toxic or both [1,2]. Table 1 shows properties (molecular weight
M, normal boiling point NBP at pressure 1 bar, critical temperature CRT,
critical pressure CRP, safety group according to ASHRAE standard 34, ozone
depletion potential ODP and global warming potential GWP based on 100 years) of
practical refrigerants available for vapor compression cycles at the end of the
19th century.
Table 1.Properties of early refrigerants.
Substance | R number | Chemical formula | M kg/kmol | NBP oC | CRT oC | CRP bar | Safety group | ODP | GWP100 |
Carbon dioxide | R-744 | CO2 | 44,01 | -55,61 | 31,6 | 73,77 | A1 | 0 | 1 |
Ammonia | R-717 | NH3 | 17,03 | -33,3 | 132,25 | 113,33 | B2 (B2L2) | 0 | 0 |
Sulfur dioxide | R-764 | SO2 | 64,06 | -10,0 | 157,49 | 78,84 | B1 | 0 | 0 |
Ethylether | R-610 | C4H10O | 74,12 | 35 | 194,0 | 36 | - | 0 | 0 |
Dimethylether | E-170 | C2H6O | 46,07 | -25 | 126,9 | 53,7 | A3 | 0 | 0 |
Methyl chloride | R-40 | CH3Cl | 50,49 | -24,2 | 143,1 | 66,77 | B2 | 0,02 | 16 |
1 – tripple point
2 – new class introduced since 2010
The second generation of
refrigerants,
chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) replaced classic refrigerants in early 20th
century. Midgeley and his associates, in their
research aimed to find for stable, but neither toxic nor flammable refrigerant
in 1928, selected R-12, dichlorodifloromethane as a
suitable compound for refrigeration applications [2]. The commercial production
of R-12 began in 1931, followed by R-11 in 1932 and R-13 for low temperature
applications in 1945. Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and starting in 1950s hydrochlorofluorocarbons represented by R-22 and azeotropic mixture R-502 dominated the second generation of
refrigerants. Those refrigerants dominated throughout the second half of 20th
century. Ammonia was only natural refrigerant that still remained the most
popular refrigerant in industrial applications. [1,2]
Table 2.Properties of CFC and HCFC refrigerants dominant in 20th
century.
Substance | R number | Chemical formula | M kg/kmol | NBP oC | CRT oC | CRP bar | Safety group | ODP | GWP100 |
Trichlorofluoromethane | R-11 | CCl3F | 137,4 | 23,71 | 197,96 | 44,1 | A1 | 1 | 4000 |
Dichlorodifluoromethane | R-12 | CCl2F2 | 120,91 | -29,75 | 111,97 | 41,4 | A1 | 1 | 8500 |
Chlorotrifluoromethane | R-13 | CClF3 | 104,5 | -81,3 | 29,2 | 39,2 | A1 | 1 | 11700 |
chlorodifluoromethane | R-22 | CHClF2 | 86,47 | -40,81 | 96,15 | 49,9 | A1 | 0,055 | 1700 |
R22/R115 | R-502 | CHClF2 + | 111,6 | -45,3 | 80,73 | 40,2 | A1 | 0,33 | 5600 |
Present
situation is determined by use of refrigerants of zero ODP with no impact on
ozone layer, according to demands of Montreal protocol (1987). In 1974
researchers Roland and Molina predicted that emissions of HFCs
could damage Earth’s atmosphere by the catalytic destruction of ozone in the
stratosphere. The hypothesis has been proven in 1985 by measurements which have
shown the destruction of the ozone layer over Antarctica. In 1987, the Montreal
Protocol limits the production and consumption of CFCs. Between 1990 and the
present emissions have decreased substantially as a result of the Montreal
Protocol and its subsequent amendments and adjustments coming into force.By 2008,
stratospheric chlorine abundances in the stratosphere were 10% lower than their
peak values reached in the late 1990s and were continuing to decrease. January
2010 marked the end of global production of CFCs under the Protocol. In 2009
the Montreal Protocol was universally ratified by 196 nations [3]. European
regulation concerning that issue is No. 2037/2000 of June 29, 2000 on
substances that deplete the ozone layer.
The
discontinuation of CFC (2006) and HCFC (2015) use brings us to the today’s
state of utilization of HFCs, the mixtures thereof
and the natural refrigerants. In EU countries HCFC phase-out has been
accelerated and those are not in use anymore. Today’s refrigerants may not
contain chlorine, they must ensure efficient
performance and must have a low impact on global warming.
The
commercially available refrigeration units mostly use R-134A for fresh produce
and R-404A (or R-507A) for frozen produce. Natural refrigerant R-290 is in some
countries used in refrigerated display cabinets at medium and low temperatures.
R-404A is used in direct central refrigeration systems for low and medium
refrigeration temperatures. It may also be used for both fresh and frozen
produce. Natural refrigerant CO2 is used as a refrigerant in the
lower cascade of the cascade systems or in transcritical
systems. It may also be used either as a heat transfer medium. R-134A dominates
as the refrigerant in the home refrigeration units and some regions use the
hydrocarbons (e.g. isobutane R-600a) as well [4].
Ammonia is
still widely used in industrial systems and its previously decreasing
utilization due to halogenated hydrocarbons use is on the increase again [4].
The modern-day refrigeration systems using ammonia are constructed with the
tendency of decreasing ammonia charge in the system as much as possible for
safety reasons. One way of doing that is to apply indirect systems with the
heat transfer medium, so that the ammonia is kept in the refrigeration device,
whereas the heat transfer medium flows through the distribution system.
Chillers
are important part of HVAC installations. R-134a is used in large chillers
equipped with centrifugal compressors and flooded evaporators. R-407C is used
in direct expansion systems with counter flow heat exchangers. Recently, R-410A
units became competitive with the R-407C units and almost fully replaced them
in use. Design of micro channel heat exchangers was initiated by development of
R-410A equipment. CO2 is not usually used in chillers, mostly due to
low energy efficiency of the process. CO2 heat pumps for water
heating started selling in Japan in 2001. They can heat the domestic water up to
70-80°C. The capacity of those chillers goes up to 100 kW. A transcritical cycle operated VRF systems have also been
available on the market in recent years, but problems with lower efficiency and
construction of high pressure refrigerant piping never allowed wide
application. In recent years Japanese producers have pushed hard R-32 as a
suitable refrigerant for VRF systems. New safety class A2L as defined by ASHRAE
standard 34 discussed in previous paper (Part 1) comprises R-32 as well and one
of arguments for R-32 application is the lower burning velocity as described in
class A2L definition. The market share of ammonia chillers is still very small
due to important issues as safety, charge reduction and first cost. Recently
increased research focused on charge reduction (and thus safety) and energy
efficiency of those chillers can give boost to wider use of ammonia chillers in
HVAC, besides traditional industrial, food processing and beverage
applications. Hydrocarbon chillers production is very low. Refrigerants are
R1270, R290 and propane and ethane mixtures. The typical performance ranges
from 20 to 300 kW and the amount of the refrigerant from 3 to 34 kilograms [4].
Table 3.Some ozone friendly refrigerants (ODP = 0).
R number | Chemical formula / composition | M | NBP | CT | CP | Temp. glide | Safety group | GWP100 |
kg/kmol | [°C] | [°C] | bar | [°C] | ||||
R-32 | CH2F2 | -52,02 | -51,65 | 78,11 | 57,8 | 0 | A2L1 | 580 |
R-134A | CH2FCF3 | 102,03 | -26,07 | 101,06 | 40,6 | 0 | A1 | 1300 |
R-404A | R143A/125/134A | 97,6 | -46,6 | 72,14 | 37,4 | 0,46 | A1 | 3800 |
R-407C | R32/125/134A | 86,2 | -43,8 | 86,05 | 46,3 | 5,59 | A1 | 1600 |
R-410A | R32/125 | 72,59 | -51,6 | 70,17 | 47,7 | 0,1 | A1 | 1900 |
R-507 | R143A/125 | 98,86 | -47,1 | 70,75 | 37,2 | 0 | A1 | 4000 |
R-508A | R23/116 | 100,1 | -87,4 | 11,01 | 37,0 | 0 | A1 | 13000 |
R-717 | NH3 | 17,03 | -33,3 | 132,25 | 113,33 | 0 | B2L1 | 0 |
R-744 | CO2 | 44,01 | -55,6 | 31,6 | 73,77 | 0 | A1 | 1 |
R-600A | CH(CH3)3 | 58,12 | -11,6 | 134,66 | 36,29 | 0 | A3 | 20 |
R-290 | C3H8 | 44,1 | -42,11 | 96,74 | 42,51 | 0 | A3 | 20 |
R-1270 | C3H6 | 42,08 | -47,62 | 91,06 | 45,55 | 0 | A3 | 20 |
¹ – new safety classes introduced since 2010
Replacement
of R-22 in existing refrigeration systems is still actual.
There is a significant number of chillers with high
performance, built for a longer operational period, and those chillers are
potential candidates for that operation called “retrofit”. Retrofit basically
means adaptation of the refrigeration system to the new refrigerant with
changed safety and control equipment and instrumentation within the system, and
with changed system performance. That adaptation is not so simple, especially
in the case when transition from mineral oil lubricated systems (HCFCs) to synthetic oil lubricated systems (HFCs) is necessary. A lot of research is ongoing presently
in order to find suitable, so called “drop-in” replacement for R22. Experience with previous retrofit of R12 systems using replacement
R-134A do not give boost to any enthusiastic expectations. Cost of such
an operation should carefully be analyzed, and experience shows that equipment
replacement is much more likely to occur instead of retrofit.
Table 4.Today’s refrigerant alternatives. [5]
Traditional Service Refrigerants | Medium and Long-Term Alternative Refrigerants | ||||||
HCFC/HFC Partly chlorinated | HFS Chlorine fee | Low GWP refrigerants | Halogen free natural | ||||
Single substances | Blends | Single substances | Blends | Single substances | Blends | Single substances | Blends |
R-22 R-123 R-124 R-142B | Predominantly R-22 based | R-134A R-125 R-32 R-143A R-152A | R-404A R-507A R-407 serie R-410A R-417A7B7 R-422A/D R-427A | HFO-1234yf HFO 1234ze | HFO-1234yf/ HFO 1234ze/ HFC | R-717 R-290 R-1270 R-600A R-170 R-744 | R-600A/ R290 R-290/ R-170 R-723 |
GWP of HFCs is another issue addressed by Kyoto protocol (1997). The
European Parliament has issued a directive (No. 842/2006) banning the use of HFCs whose GWP is higher than 150 (the “F Gas” Directive)
in air-conditioning units of newer cars from 2011 and of all new cars from
2017. Directive also requires periodic leakage check-ups of stationary systems
containing HFCs. Changes may be expected in the
direction of the ban on HFCs with high GWP use in
stationary systems. Review of the F-gas Regulation started in 2010. The
European Commission proposal is to broaden the scope of the regulation to refrigerated
transport, to modify the frequency of leakage checks based on the CO2
equivalents of the HFCs used and to modify the
obligations regarding training and certification of personnel. A gradual phase-down
of HFCs is also proposed using the 2008-2011 total quantity
of HFCs in EU as a baseline. The document proposes a
freeze by 2015 and a gradual reduction ending with 21% of baseline quantity by
2030. This proposal also includes a ban on HFCs in domestic,
hermetically sealed commercial systems and movable air-conditioners by January
1st 2015. Refrigerators and freezers for commercial use
(hermetically sealed systems) will be prohibited by January 1st 2017
for HFCs with a GWP of 2500 or more and by January 1st
2020 for HFCs with a GWP of 150 or more. Movable room
air-conditioning appliances (hermetically sealed) using HFCs
with a GWP of 150 or more will be prohibited by January 1st 2020.
Industry and trade organizations agree on a phase-down of HFCs
but with a less ambitious goals and some
modifications. The approval of the proposed action is necessary within the
European Council. Then the proposal shall be discussed at the level of the European
Parliament. A new regulation cannot enter into force before 2014 and it is very
likely that modifications will be adopted during the approval process. However,
a phase-down of HFCs will certainly take place in
Europe in the near future [6].
Possible
future development of refrigerants is not easy to predict. Interesting
projection is presented in Calm’s paper [2] and the summary is repeated in Table 5.
Table 5.Possible directions of future development of refrigerants. [2]
Refrigerants | Remarks |
Natural
refrigerants | Efficiency;
flammability for NH3 and HCs |
HFCs
with low GWP | Flammability,
most of the ones that are subject to the ban have a high GWP |
HydrofluoroethersHFEs | Disappointing
thus far, still? |
Ethers (HEs) | Flammability |
Olefins –
unsaturated alkenes | Short
atmospheric lifetime and therefore low GWP. Flammability? Toxicity?
Compatibility? |
HFICs
and FICs | Expensive,
ODP>0, but not subject to the Montreal Protocol. Some are toxic.
Compatibility? |
Fluorinated
alcohols (-OH) and ketones | Efficiency?
Flammability? Toxicity? Compatibility? |
Other | ??? - no
ideal refrigerant |
From the
viewpoint of the author of this article, natural refrigerants, especially
ammonia are presently available, and long experience exists with their
application dating far into the beginning of mechanical refrigeration. The
“circle” is now somehow closed, we already returned to natural refrigerants,
but now with new technologies and with a lot of experience behind us.
Ammoniahas no ozone depletion potential (ODP = 0) and
no direct global warming potential (GWP = 0). Due to high energy efficiency of
refrigerating equipment operating with ammonia, its contribution to the
indirect global warming potential is also low. Ammonia is flammable. However, its
ignition energy is 50 times higher than that of natural gas and ammonia will
not burn without a supporting flame. Due to the high affinity of ammonia
towards (air) humidity it is rated as "hardly flammable". Ammonia is
toxic, but has a characteristic, sharp smell which makes a warning below
concentrations of 3 mg/m3 ammonia in air possible. This means that
ammonia is evident at levels far below those which endanger health. Furthermore
ammonia is lighter than air and therefore rises quickly into the atmosphere [7].
New experience shows that with proper care ammonia can be used efficiently and
in a secure manner even in HVAC systems. The market opportunity produced by
R-22 phase-out should not be missed by ammonia chiller producers. The major
obstacles are legal demands in some countries as well as high initial costs as
the consequence of present production in small series. Experience shows also
that reasonless fear is connected with security of ammonia application and that
should be overcome by adequate addressing to technical as well as to general
public.
Carbon dioxide has low critical temperature and
condensation is not possible at supercritical temperatures. In that case transcritical process presented in Figure 1can be used. Refrigerant cooling
down with significant temperature glide at a constant pressure p1 takes place in a gas
cooler (without the phase change) instead in the condenser. Pressure p1 is not
temperature-dependent as in subcritical processes. Temperature glide makes such
a process more suitable for countercurrent domestic
hot water heating than for application within heating systems with circulation.
Internal heat exchange between condensed liquid and suction vapor
refrigerant can increase process efficiency. Recent research activities have
focused particularly on optimizing plant engineering, and more effective
refrigeration plants are being developed to benefit from its extraordinary
properties [7].
Figure 1. Single-stage vapor - compression transcritical process with R-744 (CO2) in
temperature - entropy t,s-
and pressure – enthalpy p,h- diagrams.
Hydrocarbons
like propane (R290, C3H8), propylene (R1270, C3H6)
or isobutane (R600a, C4H10)
have been used in refrigeration plants all over the world for many years.
Hydrocarbons are colorless and nearly odorless gases that liquefy under
pressure, and have neither ozone depletion potential (ODP=0) nor significant
direct global warming potential (GWP < 3). Thanks to their
thermodynamic characteristics, hydrocarbons make particularly energy efficient
refrigerants. Hydrocarbons are flammable, however, with current safety
regulations, refrigerant losses can be maintained near zero. Hydrocarbons are
available cheaply all over the world; thanks to their ideal refrigerant
characteristics they are commonly used in small plants with low refrigerant
charges [7].
In the
future we may expect further research, regulation changes, the design of new systems
suitable for the use of newly developed and natural refrigerants, the
optimization of the system in the sense of compensating the lower efficiency of
some refrigerants, but with keeping cost within acceptable limits. Conclusion
is always the same: “No ideal refrigerant”, but proper applications suitable
for different refrigerants can be found. The chance for “closing the circle”
and return to natural refrigerants at a new, high technology level exists and
should not be missed.
Literature[1] Pearson, S.F.: Refrigerants Past, Present and Future, Bull. IIF-IIR/www.iifiir.org, IIF-IIR Paris, 2004 [2] Calm, J.M.: The Next Generation of Refrigerants, Bull. IIF-IIR 2008-1/www.iifiir.org, IIF-IIR Paris, 2008 [3] Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2010, Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project - Report No. 52, World Meteorological Organization, 2010 [4] Billiard, F.: Refrigerating Equipment, Energy Efficiency and Refrigerants, Bull. IIF-IIR 2005-1/www.iifiir.org, IIF-IIR Paris, 2005 [5] Refrigerant Report 17, BitzerKältemaschinenbau GmbH, Sindelfingen DE, 2012 [6] IIF – IIR Newsletter No. 53, IIF-IIR Paris FR, 2013 [7] www.eurammon.com |
Follow us on social media accounts to stay up to date with REHVA actualities
0