Stay Informed
Follow us on social media accounts to stay up to date with REHVA actualities
We
demonstrated an innovative evaporative pre-cooling system that improved energy
efficiency of a mini-split air conditioner by 21% seasonally in Florida’s humid
climate. Further, the same apparatus was able to improve air
conditioner efficiency by almost 50% at a peak condition of 35°C outdoors.
COP at this very hot condition was still 5.1 W/W. Average water
consumption of the evaporator cooler was about 22 liters per day – a
modest consumption given large improvements in air conditioning energy
efficiency. With condensate water plumbed to the evaporative sump, estimated net
water needs could be less than 4 L per day in humid climates and need to
dump sump water is greatly reduced.
Figure 1.
FSEC Evaporative Mini-split cooling system.
The
pre-cooler assembly is inexpensive with few moving parts and could be
manufactured as add-on or OEM kits for mini-split air conditioners. Estimated retail
cost is €350 or less. The evaporative pre-cooler could improve seasonal cooling
efficiency by 30–50% in most European climates (Lecce: 37%, Lisbon: 33%,
Athens: 36%, Sevilla: 46% and Madrid: 50%) with dramatic improvements in peak
cooling performance- desirable for capacity constrained utilities. Extensive
test data is available in the full laboratory report and two units have been
under long term evaluation. With no obvious prior art, patents have been filed.
Figure 2.
Measured COP vs. outdoor temp.
There are
two major competing evaporative cooling air conditioner technologies to that
developed by FSEC. The two most prominent are EvaporCool
in the U.S. (www.evaporcool.com) and the EneCut
in Japan (http://bit.ly/18vtkra). Both systems use nozzles to mist water before
the evaporator coil. While nozzles are effective for evaporative pre-cooling, they
have several drawbacks as indicated below:
·
Mist can be entrained into the air stream reaching
the condensing coils, possibly fouling these and making AC manufacturers leery
of honoring warranties
·
Nozzles
are prone to fouling, particularly with hard water supplies
·
Variations
in city water pressure can affect coverage
·
Greater
power is required for misting (our system uses a simple 4 W pump) and more
sophisticated controls.
·
The
mist from the nozzles is prone to "drift" from wind which makes this
largely impractical for residential AC units where the air flow into the
condenser is at a relative low rate. Misted
drift from the nozzles can deface adjacent walls or create other maintenance
issues.
Unlike
previous evaporative cooling concepts, the configuration is simple and robust. The
FSEC concept has much greater potential reliability, no potential to create
droplets that might harm the equipment or the home surroundings. We use
sacrificial off the shelf and recyclable evaporative media that is replaced
every four years. To expend pad life, we measure total dissolved solids
continuously and dump sump water (~7 L) when TDS is greater than 1 500 ppm.
The rate of water consumption of the FSEC evaporative cooler is modest
and can be effectively supplemented by using condensate water. Figure 3 shows the condensate release and evaporative
cooler water and use rates summarized over a 24-hour period. This shows that,
evaporative cooler water use is higher in the daytime hours and lower at night
than the condensate release. Evaluating more closely, on average, a condensate
collection sump that was 4.2 liters larger in capacity than pump inlet point,
would result in best utilization of daily condensate water use for the
evaporative cooler.
Figure 3.
Evap cooler water use v. condensate release.
Offering 30–50% efficiency improvement and modest water use, the
evaporative cooling concept is particularly attractive with multi-splits where
lower overall efficiency is overcome by large improvements in single condensers.
Electric utilities will be interested in the technology since peak summer
cooling power is reliably reduced by 50% or more even in humid climate.
Follow us on social media accounts to stay up to date with REHVA actualities
0