Stay Informed
Follow us on social media accounts to stay up to date with REHVA actualities
Simultaneous
indoor and outdoor air PM2.5 measurement result one year after the
refurbishment.
Millions of
people die each year due to air pollution and indoor air pollution is the
second highest killer in India. Respirable Suspended Particulate Matter (RSPM)
is the main ambient and indoor air pollutant in India[1].
Between 2005 and 2010, the death rate rose by 4% worldwide and by 12% in India.
Cost of air pollution to society in 2010 was estimated at US$ 0.5 trillion in
India according to a study by the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and
Development (OECD)[2].
According Central Pollution Control Board’s (CPCB) database[3]
that includes RSPM data of 124 Indian cities, 123 cities have the PM2.5 annual
average level above WHO Air Quality Guideline level (10 µg/m³)[4]. Delhi
annual average PM2.5 value was 122 µg/ m³. The International Agency for
Research on Cancer (IARC) and WHO concluded in 2013 that ultra-fine particulate
matter is carcinogenic to humans[5].
In this project,
we focused on the indoor air quality improvement in a one of the largest
international school campuses in Delhi.
School
campus in Delhi.
The school
campus consists of 10 school buildings and 3 residential buildings. Each
building has a mechanical ventilation system with cooling. The typical system
consists of an air handling unit (AHU) located inside an air handling unit
room. The air handling unit is supplying the cooled air into the classrooms or
apartments via ducts. The return air path is a ceiling void and corridors.
Fresh air intake is via a duct from the façade into the air handling unit room.
Outdoor air volume is controlled by a damper at the end of the duct. Some of
the classrooms and apartments have e additional fan coil units for local
cooling. All air handling units had either EU2 or EU4 filters.
The school
wanted to address increased concerns with indoor air quality (IAQ) as it is
related to staff and student health. But it was not clear for the school what
all need to be done to ensure good air quality inside the buildings. Room air
purifiers had been tested but the air quality results were not good and, also,
the high maintenance was an issue. Lots of plants had already been located in
school premises to purify air, but mechanical ventilation system had not been
addressed.
To improve
indoor air quality (IAQ) in school campus, we first had to understand the
current performance of ventilation systems in each building, the current
maintenance practices and the current IAQ & user satisfaction. In the
second phase the recommended solution was designed and piloted in one of the
buildings and then later the same concept with some improvements were executed
in all buildings at the campus.
During the
‘Indoor Air Quality and Ventilation System Performance Study’ we reviewed all
buildings in the school campus. We studied the maintenance practices, we
conducted the user satisfaction survey, we measured the indoor air quality
(IAQ) parameters in various locations in each building and we studied the
ventilation system operation.
The User
Satisfaction Survey consisted on three major elements: perceived indoor
environmental quality (based on the CBE Berkeley questionnaire), users’
awareness of air quality problems in Delhi and user’s Building Related Health
Symptoms (based on the Orebro MM40 questionnaire). We covered the following
areas: Thermal comfort, Indoor air quality, Lighting and daylight, Acoustic
conditions and Cleanliness. Survey results shows that the Indoor Air Quality
(60% dissatisfied) and Thermal Comfort (40% dissatisfied) are the two major
areas creating dissatisfaction among the users.
User
satisfaction results before refurbishment.
The only
symptom that stands out is coughing which may be due to the high level of
particulates and irritants in the respiratory system.
We measured
temperature, relative humidity, CO2 and particulate matter in several
locations in each building. Temperature was mainly comfortable in all those
spaces, where either fan coil units were operating or ventilation was properly
functioning. High temperature and CO2 were problems in the rooms where
there was no sufficient ventilation. Relative humidity was mainly below 65%,
however during the measurements the outdoor air was very dry. The biggest IAQ
problem were the high ultra-fine particulate matter (PM2.5) levels. They were
very high everywhere, sometimes even higher than in the outdoor air, especially
near the doors and in the spaces with several printers and copy machines. The
PM5 levels were between 100 and 200 µg/m³ during the measurement both in
indoor air and outdoor air.
During the
ventilation system performance review, we measured air flow rates in each air
handling unit and pressure loss across each component (filters, cooling coil
and fan). Air flow rates in all air handling units were below design value. The
current filtration G3+G4 was not sufficient to remove RSPM. The pressure loss
across the filter section was very low, about 40–100 Pa only, indicating
the poor quality of current G4 filters. This was confirmed with visual
inspection – there were lots of damaged filters and due to the regular washing,
the filter media had worn out.
To improve
air quality, ambient air and AHU filtration needs to be improved, buildings
needs to be properly over-pressurized to avoid ambient air from entering
indoors via windows and doors and each room to have the sufficient amount of
supply air. Maintenance and operation of ventilation system needs to be
improved. HVAC-system components (including AHU rooms) need to be maintained at
a high standard. Operation and maintenance personnel need additional training
to better manage the operation of ventilation and air conditioning system in
each building. Regular 3rd party inspection of indoor air
quality and HVAC-system operation is required.
The main
target was to reduce indoor air particulate matter PM2.5 level to be 70% below
ambient air level. Simultaneously, traffic emissions (NO2, SO2, O3) shall
be removed from the supply air and cooling capacity needs to be improved in
classrooms by ensuring correct ventilation rates and balancing the ductwork
properly.
The
selected solution consists of retrofitting an ambient air purifier into each
AHU room, repairing and cleaning the ventilation system, balancing the ductwork
and improving the system maintenance. Ambient Air Purifier (AAP) is a
fan-filter unit that cleans the outdoor air before it is supplied into the AHU
room. The fresh air supply of each unit was designed at 1.5 l/s,m² (which
equals 15% of the total air handling unit air volume), which gives the air
exchange efficiency of 2 air changes per hour. Each unit has a place for five
filters: washable G4 filter, M5 coarse filter, F9 fine filter, chemical filter
and M6 post-chemical filter. This unit shall give the filtration efficiency
that is more than 99% for PM2.5, 100% for PM10 and remove gases from outdoor
air.
Proposed
Ambient Air Purifier solution to clean the outdoor air before it is supplied to
the AHU room.
The
ventilation system required lots of small repairs and maintenance activities.
All air handling unit rooms were cleaned and sealed properly. New G4 filters
were installed to all air handling units. Some ductwork modifications were
done. All loose mineral wool surfaces were covered inside the air handling
units and ducts. Ducts and diffusers were cleaned. After installing the Ambient
Air Purifier units, some new balancing dampers were installed and all ductworks
were balanced in order to have sufficient ventilation and to maintain positive
pressure in all classrooms against outdoor air and other spaces.
After the
pilot project the indoor air quality was measured and compared with ambient air
quality as the target was set relative to that. During the measurement period,
the ambient air PM2.5 level was 142 µg/m³ and in the classrooms 7 µg/m³.
This is 95% less than ambient air level. Also, SO2, NOx
and O3 levels were below detectable limit.
This case
study shows that indoor air quality can be improved a lot even in the most
polluted cities in the world by designing and maintaining the ventilation
system properly and that standalone, high maintenance requiring room air
purifiers are not necessary. In this case, the ambient air purifiers were
installed, but the same result in terms of IAQ could have been achieved by
retrofitting existing air handling units with similar set of filters and new EC
fans. However, this would have meant higher filtration and energy cost, as the
improved filtration would have been needed for the total air volume. Now the higher-pressure
loss impacts only 15% of the air and also the number of filters to be changed
annually is less. This case study proves, that as long as the main pollution
source is the outdoor air, good IAQ can be achieved by just properly cleaning
the outdoor air before supplying it into a building.
[1] UNEP
Year Book, 2014. Air Pollution: World’s Worst Environmental Health Risk.
[2] OECD Report, 2014. The Cost of Air Pollution: Health impacts of road transport.
[3] CPCB, Environmental Data Bank, Central Pollution Control Board, Government of India.
[4] WHO,
2005, Air Quality Guidelines.
[5] IARC
and WHO, 2013. Outdoor air pollution a leading environmental cause of cancer
deaths, press release no. 221.
Follow us on social media accounts to stay up to date with REHVA actualities
0