Stay Informed
Follow us on social media accounts to stay up to date with REHVA actualities
Daylight is
a central element in Active House. Today, there is ample evidence for the
importance of daylight for our health and well-being. Besides that, it is a
freely available source of high quality light of high luminous efficacy
(visible flux as a proportion of radiant flux, lm/W).
There are
two objective metrics for the quality of daylight in the Active House
specification. The first is the well known daylight factor, DF. The daylight
factor measures the ratio between the interior horizontal illuminance
and the unobstructed exterior horizontal illuminance
under overcast sky conditions. An adequate daylight factor ensures that under
worst case conditions (overcast sky) there still is adequate daylight. The
specifications require a DF > 5% for the highest rating on this aspect or a
DF > 3% for the second highest rating (averaged over the area of the space).
It is clear that a high DF is directly related to large window size and is
further influenced by obstacles in the immediate environment of the building. Figure 1 shows a living room with an area averaged DF > 5.
The second
metric applies to at least one of the main habitable rooms and requires that
between the fall and spring equinox this room receives at least 10% of the
probable sunlight hours for the highest rating on this aspect and at least 7.5%
for the second highest rating. This second metric is clearly related to orientation
– favoring south orientations – and takes obstructions in the environment into
account. The specifications recommend that a shading device should allow for
direct sunlight to be excluded if desired.
Figure 1.
Model living room having an average daylight factor DF of 5.3% at a height of
0.85 m above the floor. From the model it is clear that a daylight factor
> 5% requires a fair amount of glazing. The window to wall ratio in this
case is 17%. It is also clear that there is quite some variation over the
surface of the room: 49% of the area has 2% < DF < 5%, 42% of the area
has DF > 6% and 9% of the area has DF < 2%. Without the two windows at
the right, the DF drops to 3.7%. |
At a ventilation regime of 0.2 ACH during the night and 2 ACH during occupancy (conforming to the Active House specifications), the annual energy requirement of the model living room for heating is only 3 kWh/m².a when heat recovery with an efficiency of 76% is used. The materialization of the living room is medium heavy and consists of R = 5.0 m²K/W external walls and triple glazing with U = 0.74 W/m²K, g = 0.51 and a visual transmittance of 0.69. The house is assumed to be located in Amsterdam and the glazed façade is facing south. Our living room is occupied between 7 and 22 h.
The
daylight requirements above clearly have their consequences when it comes to
thermal comfort. From the specifications: “Buildings should minimize
overheating in summer and optimize indoor temperatures in winter without
unnecessary energy use. Where possible use good building
physics and clever solar shading instead of overcomplicated and energy
intensive mechanical systems.” The Active House specifications look at
the operative temperature at room level and give requirements for the maximum
in summer and the minimum in winter. In summer, the maximum operative
temperature is related to a running mean outdoor temperature Trm as defined in EN 15251. Summer is defined as
the time of year when Trm > 12°C. In
the climate data used in our simulations there were 150 summer days according
to this definition. The summer requirement for the operative temperature reads:
Top < 0.33 × Trm + Tc, with Tc
= 20.8°C for the highest category (Class 1) and 21.8°C for the second highest
category (Class 2). These requirements are to be met during 95% of the occupied
time, which in our case translates to a maximum of 113 h during which the
requirement may be exceeded. Figure 2 shows the operative temperature for
our south oriented living room. From Figure 2it is clear that a DF > 5
and good thermal comfort are conflicting requirements without any further
measures.
Since our
living room is thermally well insulated, accumulated heat will not easily
escape. That is desirable in winter, but not so in summer. Ventilation
obviously helps to cool the building mass when ambient temperatures are lower
than the operative temperature. Therefore, we increase the ventilation rate to
2 ACH at all times during the summer season.
Figure 2.
Operative temperature in the living room without solar shading. The Class 1
requirement is exceeded during 2067 h (57% of time), for Class 2 this is 1544
h (43% of time). |
Figure 3.
Operative temperature in the living room fitted with external Venetian
blinds. The Class 1 requirement is exceeded during 76 h (2.1% of time), for
Class 2 this is 7 h (0.2% of time). |
Exterior
shading is the passive solution that can reconcile the daylight and thermal
requirements. Figure 3 shows the operative temperature of
the living room fitted with external Venetian blinds. These blinds are lowered
whenever the vertical irradiance on the façade exceeds 140 W. When
deployed, the slat angle of this blind is continuously kept in block beam solar
mode. This means that the slat angle is such that just prevents direct sunlight
to pass between slats. Whereas this mode of operation may not be the one
keeping out the maximum amount of heat, it does allow daylight to enter as much
as possible, both as diffuse radiation from the environment and as reflected
radiation from the sun. In this respect it is interesting to look at the slat
angle over the year. On a south façade, there are a lot of hours that the blind
will prevent the entrance of direct solar radiation when fully open. Under
these circumstances the view of the outdoors is unimpeded. Figure 4 shows the block beam slat angle for the south facing window. Here, the
slat angle is defined as the angle between the normal of the glazing and the
normal vector of the slat, i.e. 90 is fully open, 0 is fully closed.
Figure 4.
Annual map of the blind slat angle. The x-axis gives the months of the year,
the y-axis the hours of the day. The blind is deployed during some 2000 h.
Half of that time the blind is fully open (90˚, see text), indicated by
the brightest yellow part of the annual map. |
Besides
preventing unwanted solar heat gain, the shading also has a significant effect
on the temperature of the window pane. Without shading surface temperatures get
as high as 43.5°C. The same window fitted with an external Venetian blind has
substantially lower surface temperatures, down to 32.5°C. This is of course
reflected in the operative temperature of the room.
If one
considers the variability of solar radiation during the day and over the year,
the challenge of using sunlight and daylight is control.
Active
House encourages the application of active and integrated controls: “Through an
easy and user friendly interface, a building management system (BMS) may
control an Active House.” For the blind described in the previous section to
function, the basic controls or actors are readily available. Further integration
of these controls has advantages and is in fact needed. Figure 4 shows when the blind is deployed according to an irradiance set point
of 140 W/m². It is quite clear that such a static set point is not
desirable in winter because the blind will block valuable solar energy useful
for passive heating. A more advanced strategy to deploy the blind is needed.
It was
already stated that block beam solar is not necessarily the most effective mode
to control solar heat gain. When coupled to a BMS, it is easy to detect
temperature exceedance in the space and override the
standard slat angle control to a more closed state of the blind, thus further
reducing solar heat gain. Likewise, it is possible to use the signal of an
occupancy sensor. If there’s no one in the room, daylight is not an issue and
fully closing the blind will maximally keep out solar heat and keep the room
cooler. Whenever the user enters the space, the management system sends a
message to the blind controller to revert to daylighting
mode. Active and integrated control of a blind clearly has both comfort and
energy benefits. Individual control – the ability of the occupants to directly
influence their environment from a comfort perspective – is an important
requirement within Active House. This translates to the BMS and underlying
controllers. Firstly, they should facilitate such interventions. Secondly, the
logic should be robust and be able to deal with them. Thirdly, there should be
a mechanism that returns the system to its energy-comfort optimal routine after
a predefined time or user action.
There are
numerous other possibilities to use an active blind. Reducing thermal heat loss
during winter by closing a blind at night is a possibility. This will also
reduce condensation at the exterior pane of triple pane glazing during cold
nights. Although not really an energy or comfort aspect, it is nonetheless
valued by home owners.
Hunter
Douglas has been a contributor to the Active House Alliance since its
inception. Our philosophy of Sustainable Comfort seamlessly integrates with the
Active House vision.
We are
currently working on the practical application of solar shading and the control
strategies touched upon in the previous sections in a research project called
Active Reuse House. Participants in this project are amongst others the Rotterdam
University of Applied Sciences, the city of Rotterdam and the housing
cooperative Woonbron. In this project a consortium
aims to design, construct and evaluate an Active House in a reuse context for
building materials.
Hunter
Douglas developed a tool can be used to make analyses similar to the one
presented in this article. This tool is available for download at: tools.hde.nl/energytool2/index.html.
It contains the characteristics of our shading solutions and allows the
comparative evaluation of different designs and shading strategies.
In this
article we’ve explored the role of solar shading in Active House. In practice,
the daylighting requirements will often necessitate
substantial window size. High thermal insulation and air tightness are needed
to achieve a sufficiently low energy demand for heating. In order to meet the
summer thermal comfort criteria of Active House, an active shading strategy is
essential if mechanical cooling is to be avoided. Building physical simulation
is an essential tool for engineering an Active House. Integration of the
shading and ventilation strategy in the context of a building management system
appears to be essential.
Follow us on social media accounts to stay up to date with REHVA actualities
0