Stay Informed
Follow us on social media accounts to stay up to date with REHVA actualities
Koen VanthournoutSenior researcherVITO and EnergyVilleBoeretang 2002400 MolBelgiumKoen.vanthournout@vito.be | Sarah BogaertProject managerVITO and EnergyVilleBoeretang 2002400 MolBelgiumSarah.Bogaert@vito.be |
One of the
basic laws to maintain the stability of the electricity system is that the
electricity production must equal the electricity consumption at all times. For
this purpose, a wide range of control and planning systems are deployed,
operating in different time ranges from milliseconds up to years.
Traditionally, it is the production side that adapts to the consumption side.
More specifically, it is dominantly the fossil fuel plants that produce less or
more in function of the changes in the electricity demand.
This
arrangement is increasingly under stress, as the share of renewable and
typically intermittent and non-controllable generation is growing. At the same
time, environmental and other concerns lead to a decrease in fossil fuel
generation. And while the electrification of transport – electrical vehicles –
and of heating – heat pumps – allows for a reduced primary energy consumption,
the total electricity consumption is further increased as a side-effect. Summarized,
the share of flexible electricity production relative to the total electricity
demand is decreasing, and therefore new sources of flexibility are required to
further ensure the stability of the electricity system.
Those new
sources of flexibility can be subdivided into two clusters. A first cluster
contains everything energy storage related: batteries, pumped hydro, etc. A
second cluster is demand response, which can be considered as the inversion of
the traditional control paradigm, i.e., not only adapt the production side, but
also adapt the electricity consumption in function of the (renewable)
electricity production and/or to avoid grid congestion.
Although
there are large differences between the European Member States, in general
demand response and demand side flexibility are well-developing in the
industrial sector where the large energy consumption of a single installation
justifies a customized approach and technical solutions. Most countries have programs that allow
automatic adaptation of the electricity consumption of such large energy
intensive industrial installations. However, and despite the significant
potential, residential demand response is only slowly
developing. The cause
is what can be described as a “chicken and egg problem”: there are virtually no residential
demand response programs, because there is not enough capacity available in
terms of installed base of appliances
with the required functionality. On the other hand, development of appliances with demand side
flexibility features is low because there are so little residential demand response products which
justify the investment in this extra functionality. Without price signals, capacity fees and/or other
rewards, there is no incentive for consumers to buy demand response ready
appliances.
To overcome
this chicken and egg problem, the European Commission launched several
initiatives to stimulate the introduction of residential demand response. One
of these is the Ecodesign Preparatory Study on Smart
Appliances (lot 33 - http://www.eco-smartappliances.eu). With this preparatory
study, the European Commission wants to investigate the technical, economic,
environmental, market and societal aspects that are relevant for a broad market
introduction of smart appliances in residential and commercial sectors and the
policy instruments that can stimulate a wide roll-out of smart appliances in
Europe. The study is being executed by an expert consortium composed of VITO, ViegandMaagøe, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, MINES Paris-Tech and Wuppertal Institute.
The effective start was in the autumn of 2014 and the study is expected to be
finished in September 2016.
From the
start of the study, it became clear that ‘smart appliances’ is a term with many
domain dependent meanings. In its broadest interpretation, it is any appliance
that is internet connected and for which a cloud application exists (seeFigure 1). The preparatory study, however,
approaches smart appliances from the very specific angle of the electricity
domain. Hence, for the purpose of the lot 33 preparatory study a smart appliance is defined as an appliance that provides Demand Side
Flexibility:
·
It
is an appliance that is able to automatically respond to external stimuli e.g.
price information, direct control signals, and/or local measurements (mainly
voltage and frequency);
·
The
response is a change of the appliance’s electricity consumption pattern. These changes to the consumption pattern is what
is called the ‘flexibility’ of the smart appliance.
Figure 1. Various functionality classes associated
with smart appliances, with the functionality class highlighted that the
preparatory study is focusing on, i.e., demand side flexibility.
The study focusses
on the smart appliances and the potential flexibility generated, independent of
how this flexibility is used in a specific energy market structure. Therange of demand response business cases and
energy markets that can be supported should be as wide as possible, but market
design self, i.e. what market structure
or business cases are to be preferred, is out of scope.
The Ecodesign Directive [1]establishes a framework to set mandatory
ecological requirements for energy-using and energy-related products sold in
all 28 Member States, with the purpose of reducing the energy consumption and
other negative environmental impacts. These Ecodesign
requirements may be complemented with mandatory labelling requirements [2].
Typical Ecodesign preparatory studies focus on the energy
efficiency of a single product group, and do so according to the Methodology
for the Ecodesign of Energy-related Products ("MEErP") [3]. However, the Preparatory Study on
Smart Appliances is atypical and deviates from this default approach. It focuses
on demand response flexibility, which indirectly supports energy efficiency, as
it provides functionality that allows the electricity grid to support a larger
share of renewable production and more electrified energy-efficient appliances.
Hence, environmental and economic impacts are calculated at the level of the
overall energy system, not (only) the product itself. Secondly, it also adopts
a horizontal approach, meaning that it takes a broad range of product groups
into consideration, rather than a single one. The MEErPhas been designed
mainly for specific and homogenous product groups. Despite this, the study
follows it where possible.
The focus
of the preparatory study on smart appliances is the demand side flexibility of
residential end devices. ‘End device’ means the appliance that is controlled and that alters its electricity
consumption, as opposed to the
equipment higher up in the control chain (devices that control other appliances or end
devices).
The end devices
within the scope of the study are listed in Table
1. These product groups have been
categorized based on their potential, which was analyzed based on the product-specific end-use parameters
and user requirements, daily and seasonal use patterns, comfort constraints and
expected flexibility.
Table 1 The appliances within scope of the
preparatory study, divided into three categories; ‘high potential’: high
flexibility potential with few comfort and/or performance impacts, ‘medium
potential’: smaller flexibility potential and/or larger comfort/health impacts,
and ‘low/no potential’: only emergency flexibility potential.
High potential | Medium potential | Low/no potential |
Washing machines | Refrigerators/freezers | Electric water heater (instantaneous) |
Dishwasher | Battery
operated rechargeable appliances (smart phone and tablets) | Battery
operated rechargeable appliances (others) |
Washer-dryer | Tumble dryer | Vacuum cleaners |
HVAC (radiators, boilers, heat pumps,
circulators, residential and non-residential air conditioners) | HVAC (extraction
fans, heat recovery ventilation and air handlings units) | Range
hoods |
Buffered electric water heater | Lighting | |
Battery storage systems | Electrical
hobs | |
Ovens |
Out of
these categories, following product groups were selected for further in depth
study:
·
Washing
machines
·
Tumble
dryers
·
Dishwashers
·
Refrigerators
and freezers
·
Commercial
refrigeration products
·
Water
heaters (continuous)
·
HVAC
heating in residential and tertiary buildings (electric heating)
·
HVAC
cooling in residential and tertiary buildings (air conditioning)
·
Residential
energy storage systems
The study
will further focus on the functionality that is required to achieve demand response readiness of the appliances. An example of such
functionality is, for instance, the ability to remotely switch air conditioners
on or off within the boundaries of the user’s comfort settings.
A second
focus is the interoperability of smart appliance, i.e., what is
required to ensure that smart appliances can be used ‘plug and play’ throughout
the E.U., without risk of customer lock-in.
A
stakeholder consultation process has been set up and all deliverables are
available via the website http://www.eco-smartappliances.eu. The site also
provides information on the procedure and timeframe for written comments. A first
stakeholder meeting, held on 10 March 2015 in Brussels, was dedicated to
introducing the scope, objectives and structure of the Preparatory Study, and
included discussions on the products’ scope, and the standardization and
interoperability issues. The final MEErP Task 1
report of the study, which defines the scope, has been published in December
2015.
During a
second stakeholder meeting on 19 November 2015, the draft reports of MEErP Tasks 2-4 were discussed, containing respectively an
economic and market analysis for smart appliances, the impact study of smart
appliances on the user and a technical analysis of the existing products and
the state of the art.
Currently, model calculations are being
executed to assess the economic and environmental value of the flexibility provided
by smart appliances for the electrical energy system. Draft results are
expected to be published in the next months. The next stakeholder meeting to discuss these
results is expected to take place before Summer. The study is expected to
finish by the end of September 2016.
[1] Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-related products. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32009L0125.
[2] Directive 2010/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy and other resources by energy-related products. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32010L0030.
[3] Methodology for the Ecodesign of Energy-related Products (MEErP). http://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/sustainability/ecodesign/
Follow us on social media accounts to stay up to date with REHVA actualities
0