Stay Informed
Follow us on social media accounts to stay up to date with REHVA actualities
FriedemannStelzerEnvironmental Citizens' Organisation for Standardisation
(ECOS) - Energiebuendel – Independent Engineering
Consultant, Reutlingen, GERMANY, info@energiebuendel.com | ChristoforosSpiliotopoulosEnvironmental Citizens' Organisation for Standardisation
(ECOS) - Policy Officer, chris.spiliotopoulos@ecostandard.org |
For the past three years, ECOS has
participated in a project to renew a set of CEN standards to support the
EPBD recast, requested by the European Commission. In an area of wide national
divergence in terms of approach, ECOS maintained a strong and ambitious
objective: to contribute towards more energy efficient buildings in Europe by
putting forth the environmental perspective, technical field expertise, and a
call for harmonisation of European approaches. The
project's wide scope and ambitious timeline demanded understanding of the main
structure, systematic participation, coordination and cohesion between multiple
Committees and experts.
This new set of EPB standards under M/480
will be a valuable set of tools for technical experts, professionals and other
stakeholders, offering more detailed possibilities for calculation. Considering
the challenges, the size of the task, the timing constraints, and the mobilisation of a great number of experts and committees,
the results of this project are truly creditable and valuable. At the same
time, the challenges were amplified by the lack of sufficient willingness to harmonise the methodologies and reach a common agreement
for parts where there was opportunity to do so. This signifies the need to
revisit these standards in the future, in order to ensure their continuous
improvement and a higher level of harmonisation.
The road to a harmonised
and realistic methodology that would allow comparing the performance of
buildings across Europe requires compromises amongst national representations.
That is because the building regulation (mainly applicable for new buildings
and building permits) in EU member states is subject of national legislation
(the subsidiarity principle according the EU treaty). This means that EU-MS’s
are free to use the developed EPB standards. Different approaches are
traditionally embedded in the methods of Member States without necessarily
constituting realistic solutions for all climates. One example comes from prEN 16798-1 (former EN 15251), where four
different possibilities to determine necessary air flow rates in residential
buildings are accepted, based on air change per hour for each room or entity,
outdoor air supply per person, required exhaust rates (bathroom, toilets, and
kitchens) or on minimum opening areas. The M/480 requirements of having a
common template for declaring national or regional options, boundary conditions
and input data, do indeed offer flexibility and a level of transparency, but at
the same time, prove insufficient for real and fair comparisons across Member
States. The tables with default values offered by the CEN EPB standards
provide a limited level of harmonisation being only
voluntary.
Standards are living documents in the sense
that they reflect state of the art and technological progress in terms of
methodologies. That means making the methodology adaptable to taking into
account a wider variety of possible use scenarios, different types of buildings
and available technologies. The current methodologies still do not address
those parameters sufficiently. For example, Nearly Zero Energy Buildings
(NZEBs) would require calculation methods closer to the experiences gained from
research and monitoring of such existing buildings. Some of these possibilities
could now be incorporated in the new standards, such as the option to consider
internal gains for the calculation of the heat load. This is necessary, as
otherwise due to the big time constant of NZEBs the calculations result in
oversized heating systems.
At the same time, if the standards are to
offer a useful and applicable tool for the assessment of real buildings and the
implementation of legislation (e.g. certificates), they should be able to
produce results that reflect the reality of the contemporary building stock and
allow for a fair comparison of building performance across Europe. Therefore,
whilst the methodologies in the standards should be adaptable
and future-proof, the data and values used as input to those
methodologies ought to be realistic and, as much as possible, harmonised. Otherwise, divergence in fundamental parameters
would only portray a theoretical performance, and would not facilitate any
comparison via the means of a certificate or other form.
Another issue of major importance in the new
set of standards relates to the connection and interlinkages among them, and
the detailed analysis of the different building entities of different usages
and different mechanical systems. Therefore, partial performance indicators are
introduced, which shows the characteristic values for each of these processes
and building parts. This is a huge improvement for designers and auditors to
identify problems for each part of an examined building, to facilitate the
identification of areas of concern (e.g. energy waste), and to encourage
long-term, energy-saving measures and investments. Providing a good analysis
tool for professionals will also increase the acceptance for this complex
calculation methodology.
Follow us on social media accounts to stay up to date with REHVA actualities
0