Stay Informed
Follow us on social media accounts to stay up to date with REHVA actualities
Sylvain CourteyHead of Ventilation DepartmentEurovent Certita Certification |
Over the
past five years, a new approach has been developed within the ISO
standardization working groups to characterize filter filtration efficiency.
This new
approach is to look at filtration efficiency not only for particles with a
diameter of 0.4 μm but to consider the entire spectrum of particle
sizes.
The EN779:
2012 standard used today in Europe to characterize the filtration efficiency of
the filters for the ventilation of buildings defines the filtration classes
according to the average filtration efficiency of the particles with a diameter
of 0.4 μm (cf Table 1below).
Table 1. Filter classification according to EN 779:2012.
Group | Class | Average efficiency (Em) at 0,4 µm | Minimum efficiency at 0,4 µm |
Medium | M5 | 40≤ Em<60 | - |
M6 | 60≤ Em<80 | - | |
Fine | F7 | 80≤ Em<90 | 35 |
F8 | 90≤ Em<95 | 55 | |
F9 | 95≤ Em | 70 |
The
convention of using only the filtration efficiency of particles with a diameter
of 0.4 μm is due to the fact that particles of this size are the most
difficult to filter. Indeed, for particles with a smaller diameter, the
phenomenon of diffusion predominates, whereas for particles with a larger
diameter, the phenomenon of interception is predominant (see Figure 1 below).
Figure 1. Particle filtration efficiency according to size.
For most
media filtering the minimum efficiency is around 0.4 μm.
The current
system therefore makes it possible to compare filters between them, but it is
not easy to evaluate the effectiveness of a filter with regards to its impact
on air quality.
From this
observation, it has been suggested to characterize the filters in relation to
indicators that have been used for several years in the field of air quality:
particulate matter (PM): PM10, PM2.5 and
PM1 which respectively define the air
concentrations in liquid or solid particles whose diameter is below 10, 2.5 and
1 µm
These
indicators are used in many health and toxicological studies. They make it
possible to classify the particles according to their dangerousness:
·
Particles
with a diameter greater than 10 μm are retained by the upper airway
and are not breathed
·
Particles
with a diameter of less than 10 μm (PM10) can
penetrate the bronchi
·
Particles
with a diameter below 2.5 μm (PM2.5) can
penetrate the pulmonary alveoli
·
Particles
with a diameter below 1 μm (PM1) can
penetrate the alveoli-capillary barrier.
The new
standard therefore classifies filters relative to their filtration efficiency
for these different particle sizes according to Table 2 below.
Table 2. Filter classification according to ISO 16890-1.
Group | Initial efficiency in PMx | Discharged efficiency PMx |
ePM10 | ≥ 50% (PM10) | ≥ 50% (PM10) |
ePM2.5 | ≥ 50% (PM2.5) | ≥ 50% (PM2.5) |
ePM1 | ≥ 50% (PM1) | ≥ 50% (PM1) |
With
respect to PM1 the efficiency of a filter
classified as ePM1[80%] will be above 80% and below 85%.
a. Other changes from EN 779 :2012
The new ISO
16890 standard will be divided into four parts covering all the chapters
currently covered by EN 779: 2012 according to Table 3 below.
Table 3. Filter classification according to ISO 16890-1.
Object | ISO 16890 | EN 779 :2012 |
Technical specifications, requirements and classification | Part 1 | Chapters 5 - 6 |
Efficiency
measurements | Part 2 | Chapters 7, 8 and 9 |
Definition
of the gravimetric efficiency | Part 3 | Chapter 10.4 |
Packaging
method to determine the minimum spectral efficiency of the test | Part 4 | Chapter 11 |
Beyond the
new approach of classification of the filters certain evolutions are to be
noted:
·
requirements
have been introduced with respect to the test conditions in terms of
temperature and relative humidity.
·
the
conditioning method for determining the minimum efficiency makes it possible to
test a complete filter and not only the filter media as with the EN 779: 2012
·
"Fine
AC" dust is used to determine gravimetric efficiency as a replacement for
standardized dust such as “ASHRAE”.
The four
parts of ISO 16890[1]
have been published in December 2016. It is expected that it will last 18
months before EN 779: 2012 will be withdrawn, this to allow the manufacturers
to adapt their current catalogues.
1. Benefits for the end user | |
a. Towards a universal method? |
The
adoption of this new standard may perhaps make it possible to harmonize
worldwide the method of characterizing the efficiency of filters. Today two
systems predominate:
·
In
Europe the method EN 779: 2012 is the only one
·
In
North America the ASHRAE 52.2 method is used exclusively
·
In
Asia the European and American systems coexist.
In the
future, the new ISO standard is intended to be the universally used method.
However, there is no indication that this will be the case, a standard being of
a voluntary nature. However, we can say that this standard will be the future
reference in Europe as it has already been decided that it will replace the
current EN779: 2012. Similarly, in Asia there is a good chance that they will
become the benchmark except in the markets where US players are predominant.
However, in
North America doubts remain about the possible use of this ISO standard.
Indeed, the ASHRAE methods have been established for a long time and the United
States has shown some reluctance throughout the validation process of this ISO
standard.
As
indicated earlier, concentrations of PM10 and
to a lesser extent PM2.5 and PM1are now widely used for assessing
air quality. The European "Airbase" project gathers data from more
than 8000 continuous PM10 measurement stations in Europe (see
Figure 2 below). WHO defines guidelines for maximum
levels of concentrations not to be exceeded for PM10 and
PM2.5.
Figure 2. Location of continuous PM10 measurements in Europe (source: Airbase).
The use of
efficiency referring to these indicators will enable end-users to more easily
assess their needs based on outdoor air quality and their objectives in terms
of indoor air quality.
2. What impact on the certification of
filters for ventilation? | |||
a. The Eurovent certification for filters: | |||
i. The certification programme
« Eurovent Certified Performance » for Air Filters M5 – F9 was
launched in 2006. This certification is based on tests carried out by
independent ISO 17025 laboratories, according to EN 779:2012 (which replaced
EN 779 :2002). This programme covers the certification of all relevant
performances of filters used for general ventilation, namely: | |||
·
The filtration class ·
The initial pressure drop ·
The initial efficiency ·
The minimum efficiency These
performances related to the Standard EN 779:2012 add up to the performances
related to the energy efficiency as defined in the Standard Eurovent 4/21. ·
Annual energy consumption ·
Energy efficiency class All
certified data are available on www.eurovent-certification.com | |||
ii. In 2016 this certification programme
covers 25 manufacturers representing 25 brands and more than 2300 references.
According to the latest figures from Eurovent Market Intelligence, this
programme covers 87% of the French market and 75% of the European market. |
The first
four parts of the new ISO 16890 standard cover all the chapters covered today
by the European standard EN 779. Thus, it does not define a method for
calculating the average annual energy consumption as defined in document
Eurovent 4 / 21. A revision of the latter must therefore be carried out in
order to integrate the new provisions of ISO 16890. A Eurovent working group
dedicated to this project was recently set up, and met for the first time in
December 2015. A first revision project is planned for February 2016.
The
Eurovent certification of filters will then be able to evolve towards the new
standard once it has replaced the standard EN 779.
The new ISO
16890 Standard will have a significant impact on all the actors of filtration.
In the first place, manufacturers will have to characterize all their products
according to this new method. Knowing that standardized dust will also change
this implies a significant effort on their part, the old standardized dust
being used for decades.
Secondly,
buyers will have to completely revise their current requirements based on the
well-known filtration classes M5, M6, F7, F8 and F9. It is expected that a
transition period will be required (with dual labelling of products) before the
new efficiency classes are integrated by buyers. A major effort will have to be
made by all the players (notably the manufacturers) to communicate effectively
on these changes. The fact that the vast majority of products available on the
market are certified will facilitate this transition by providing clear and
controlled information.
ISO 16890-1, Air filters for general ventilation -- Part 1: Technical specifications, requirements and classification system based upon particular matter efficiency (ePM).
ISO
16890-2, Air filters for general ventilation – Part 2: Measurement of
fractional efficiency and air flow resistance.
ISO 16890-3, Air filters for general ventilation -- Part 3: Determination of the gravimetric efficiency and the air flow resistance versus the mass of test dust captured
ISO
16890-4, Air filters for general ventilation -- Part 4: Conditioning method to
determine the minimum fractional test efficiency
EN 779:2012, Particulate air filters for general ventilation – Determination of the filtration performance.
Eurovent 4/21 - 2014: Calculation method for the energy use related to air filters in general ventilation systems
ANSI/ASHRAE 52.2 - 2007, Method of testing general ventilation air-cleaning devices for removal efficiency by particle size
Airbase – The European Air Quality Database, http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/airbase-the-european-air-quality-database-8
OMS guidelines for air quality : particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulphur dioxide, Global update 2005. http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/78638/E90038.pdf
[1] At CEN level in Europe this ISO standard is indicated as EN-ISO 16890 and when published on national level the letters of the National Standard Body are added, like e.g. DIN-EN-ISO 16890
A new ISO standard is about to replace the current EN 779 standard used to characterize the filtration efficiency of filters now classified from G1 to F9. This new standard incorporates a different approach from the current standard in terms of classification methodology and will therefore have a significant impact on the market. It is proposed here to present the main changes, to detail the future benefits provided by this standard and to consider the impact on the certification of the filters.
New ISO 16890 - A new way to classify filters
Over the past five years, a new approach has been developed within the ISO standardization working groups to characterize filter filtration efficiency. This new approach is to look at filtration efficiency not only for particles with a diameter of 0.4 µm but to consider the entire spectrum of particle sizes. The EN779:2012 standard used today in Europe to characterize the filtration efficiency of the filters for the ventilation of buildings defines the filtration classes according to the average filtration efficiency of the particles with a diameter of 0.4 µm
Follow us on social media accounts to stay up to date with REHVA actualities
0