Stay Informed
Follow us on social media accounts to stay up to date with REHVA actualities
In order to
reach the 20-20-20 EU-targets it is essential to dramatically lower the energy
needs in a large proportion of existing buildings. This, however, has been a
great challenge in most of the European countries. The investments required for
retrofitting existing buildings are often expected to be carried out by
property owners, but how can their ambitions to considerably improve energy
performance of their buildings be increased?
It is
relatively easy to identify a number of individual measures each of which can
reduce energy needs in a building. Although some of these can be carried out at
little cost, the measures that significantly reduce energy needs often entail
considerable investments. Previous, there has been little support provided to
the property owners regarding how to make the best investment decisions. The
decisions are often based on profitability of single measures, whereas simple
economical methods are often used which does not take into account economic
life times of measures nor changes in energy prices. Often only the very
profitable measures are considered and carried out, leading to rather modest
energy savings.
To change
the mindset and motivate property owners to carry out major energy renovation a
method, called the Total Concept, has been developed and successfully applied
on a number of renovation projects of non-residential buildings in Sweden. The
method has during the last three years also been successfully introduced to
other Northern European countries. Total Concept aims is to be a market drive
for major energy renovation and thereby increase business opportunities in the
sector.
A market
analysis carried out in Finland, Denmark and Sweden shows that decreasing
energy use in a building is seldom a reason for renovating a building [1]. Based on the interviews with a number of local
property owners the most common reasons for retrofitting are change of (large) tenants, the
deterioration of existing systems or building’s envelope, as well as problems
with indoor climate.
Energy is
relatively cheap in Nordic countries and, therefore, this is a significant
obstacle for starting energy renovation projects. The property owners,
especially private ones, are very much profit oriented. Besides low energy prices,
another important barrier is the risk of not receiving the whole profit from
the energy measures. This is particularly relevant when tenants pay their
utility bills. Without a special agreement, benefits of an investment may go
directly to a tenant and not to the investor.
Additionally,
budgetary limitations as well as a fear of carrying out long-term investments
and lack of good economic models are also considered as barriers.
The main
barriers for energy retrofitting pointed out during the interviews are
illustrated on Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The main barriers for major energy retrofitting in Sweden, Denmark and Finland.
The market
study has shown that there is a high demand for energy renovation methods that
can provide building owners a comprehensive approach, reliability of the
results that energy and financial savings are achieved and that they are based
on easy-to-understand economic models. The study couldn´t identify any other
method available on the Nordic market that can adapt to this demand. Most
companies and services commonly focus on single or few issues or solutions.
·
Total
Concept is a method for improving energy performance in existing
non-residential buildings.
·
The
method applies a comprehensive approach to work with energy issues in a
building with the aim to achieve maximum savings in a profitable way.
·
The
method is based on an action plan comprising a package of energy efficiency
improvement measures that as a whole fulfils the
property owner’s profitability requirements.
·
The
work process of the Total Concept is divided into three steps in a systematic
approach covering the entire retrofitting process, from pre-study phase to
follow-up phase, and ensuring that energy saving targets are actually reached.
·
Quality
and function of the building must remain the same or be improved.
The
profitability assessment in the Total Concept method is based on an internal
rate of return method, where an investment is assessed by the actual yields
that it creates, expressed as an internal rate of return (IRR). First a comprehensive
inventory is carried out in the building to identify all possible energy saving
measures, both the
single cost-efficient (“low hanging fruits”) and the costlier measures. Then,
an action package is formed through step-by-step energy and profitability calculations. The criterion for how many measures
are included to the action package is that the combined internal rate of return of the
whole package must be
higher than the real calculation interest rate stipulated by a property owner.
How the different measures affect each other when carried out as a package and
different economic lifetimes of measures are also taken into account [2].
The profitability calculations are done with the Total Concept tool, the
TotalTool, where the outcomes
are illustrated in a
simple-to-understand way for the decision makers, by using an internal rate of
return diagram. The decision maker can see what impact each measure has in the
overall profitability and supports the decision to carry out a package of
measures instead of single profitable measures.
An example
of an action package on an internal rate of return diagram is illustrated in Figure 2.
In this example five energy efficiency measures were identified during
auditing. Every measure
leads to certain annual net savings in operating cost (k€/year), requires
certain investment cost (k€) and can be represented by a line in the diagram
with a certain length and angle. This angle represents the internal rate of
return (%) of an investment. The profitability requirement is set as 5% real
interest rate.
Figure 2.
Presentation of a package of measures with five measures in an internal rate of
return diagram. The property owners’ profitability requirement for the
investment is an internal rate of return of 5% (based on real calculation
interest rate). The whole package of measures in the example gives an internal
rate of return of 7% and leads to halving the annual energy costs.
The formed
action package provides a combined internal rate of return of 7% and leads to
halving the annual energy costs, which approximately corresponds to a halving
of the use of energy. The most profitable measures make up for the less
profitable measures while the complete action package will fulfil the
profitability frame set by the building owner. If only the measures that were
profitable on their own were carried out, the first three measures, the savings
would have been only 30%. This is the main essence of the Total Concept method
that it provides a method to take one step further with energy savings in a
profitable way.
In Sweden,
the Total Concept method has been implemented in a number of retrofitting
projects in office buildings, schools, hospitals, sports facilities, railway
stations and universities [3, 4]. The outcomes show that annual savings over 50%
are possible within the profitability frames that property owners have, which
is often in between 5% to 8% return on investment. The savings achieved are
strongly dependent on the buildings energy performance before the renovation. Figure 3
presents the expected energy savings in percentage and internal rate of return
of the action packages in a number of projects carried out in Sweden. Total
investment cost in these projects has been in average about 70 €/m², mean
annual savings about 6 €/m²yr and internal rate of return in average about
10%.
Figure 3. Total energy savings and internal rate of return in Total
Concept projects carried out or planned to be carried out in Sweden.
The Total
Concept method can easily be included in the overall retrofitting process of a
building, in which the additional investments required for achieving better
energy performance is analysed. One example of such a project is an office building
in Gothenburg, where a total renovation is carried out in order to adjust the
building for new tenants. The proposed package with 15 energy efficiency
measures will lead to energy savings about 55% with an internal rate of return
on investment of 11%. Renovation works are in progress and will be finished by
2018. The summary of the outcomes action package is presented in Figure 4.
Feedback
from the Nordic reference projects highlights the following main strengths of
the Total Concept method:
·
applying
a comprehensive approach in energy retrofitting;
·
having
a good economic tool for decision making;
·
making
early plans for commissioning and follow-up are important for assuring that
expected results are achieved;
·
follow-up
period is very useful for additional system optimization and for noticing any
malfunctions of the systems that can have high impact on the building’s energy
performance.
Year built | 1989 | |
Renovated | 2015–2018 | |
Heated floor area Atemp | 16 238 m² | |
Energy investment cost | 1 535 000 € | |
Total energy savings | ca 55% | |
Total cost savings | 172 000 €/yr. | |
Energy use before (incl. tenants) | 231 kWh/m² yr. | |
Estimated energy use after (incl. tenants) | 105 kWh/m² yr. | |
Internal rate of return | 11% |
Figure 4.
Total energy savings and internal rate of return in a major renovation project
in an office building in Gothenburg. Improving energy efficiency at the same
time based on Total Concept method will lead to total energy savings about 55%.
Retrofitting
projects based on the Total Concept method offers business opportunities for a
number of key actors in the building sector, such as energy consultants, design
engineers, contractors, energy controllers and project managers.
In Denmark,
Finland and Sweden the area of existing non-residential buildings is estimated
to be in total about 380 million m². Assuming that about 1 percent of the
existing building area would be annually renovated using the Total Concept
would mean that the yearly volume of renovation would be about 4
million m². This would correspond to the total investment volume up to
260 M€ per year in the three countries, assuming that the total renovation
cost is about 70 €/m² in average [1]. For the key actors involved in the
pre-study phase (Step 1), design work and project coordination during
construction phase (Step 2) and follow-up in monitoring phase (Step 3) the
annual market volume is estimated to be about 70 M€. This is based on the
estimation that the consulting, design work and project management share is
about 18 €/m² from the total renovation cost. Estimated size of the
renovation market for the Total Concept method in the three Nordic countries is
illustrated in Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Estimated size of the renovation market for the Total Concept method in
Northern Europe.
There is a
high demand for energy retrofitting methods on the market that can provide
building owners reliable results. Total Concept method includes economic
realities which building owners need to consider, while at the same time it
aims to increase the ambitions and making it possible to come much further in
improving buildings energy efficiency and in improving the overall quality of a
building. The Total Concept method has a great potential to become a market
leader for large scale energy renovation projects.
Financial
supports are greatly acknowledged from the Nordic Innovation program Nordic
Built and the Swedish Energy Agency. The authors would like to acknowledge the
valuable input from the stakeholders and key actors that participated in the
market study interviews as well as the BELOK group that have initiated the
Total Concept method.
[1] M-L. Maripuu, Å. Wahlström, P. Pasanen, A.
Afshari. P. Krawczyk, “Market potential and business opportunities with the
Total Concept”, report in the Nordic Built project, 2016.
www.nordictotalconcept.info.
[2] Total Concept, 2014:1, The Total Concept
method -Guidebook for Implementation and Quality assurance, Version 1.5: May
2016, www.totalconcept.info.
[3] Å. Wahlström, E. Abel and M-L Maripuu,
" Total Concept-for better decision-making about Energy Efficiency
Investments in non-Residential Buildings ", Accepted for proceeding of ECEEE Summer Study 2015, Toulon,
France, paper 6-103-15, page 1239, 1 - 6 June, 2015.
[4] M-L. Maripuu, Å. Wahlström and E. Abel,
"Swedish experiences of using Total Concept for refurbishment towards
nearly zero-energy buildings", Proceedings of the 7PHN Sustainable cities
and buildings; Copenhagen, 20.-21. August 2015.
Follow us on social media accounts to stay up to date with REHVA actualities
0