Stay Informed
Follow us on social media accounts to stay up to date with REHVA actualities
The new requirements for a residential building and
its ventilation can be summarised in: ·
energy efficiency and use of renewable energy, ·
protection from any inside and outside harmful
impact, ·
good and healthy indoor environment, ·
automatically operated and in a user friendly
(smart) manner. |
Buildings
account for approximately 40% of overall energy consumption in the EU and for
36% of greenhouse gas emissions. Alongside non-residential and industrial
buildings, residential buildings constitute a major source of emissions and
energy consumption.
The Energy
Performance in Buildings Directive (EPBD) aims to encourage EU Member States to
facilitate the market transition to Nearly Zero Energy Buildings (NZEBs) with a
very high energy performance. Whilst the drive to secure energy efficiency
improvements is a laudable objective, the demands for energy savings is seeing our homes become increasingly
airtight.
In turn,
this places new demands on residential ventilation: on the one hand ensuring
occupants a good indoor climate, on the other hand protecting the building from
damage caused by excessive air humidity, e.g. mould growth.
Legislation
requiring ever lower energy consumption, combined with an expectation of
adequate ventilation, presents a challenge for the ventilation market. It is
therefore important to choose the right solution, rather than focusing on the
cheapest options.
Currently
the main political and economic targets of the EPBD are energy savings,
environmental impact and the cost of that. We forget that buildings are not
built to save energy, money or emit low levels of CO2.
Buildings are fundamentally designed to protect humans by providing shelter
from the cold, heat, rain, sun, dust, wind etc. Furthermore, buildings should
not only provide protection from the elements, but should also ensure a high
level of Indoor Environment Quality (IEQ) including:
·
Indoor
Air Quality (IAQ),
·
thermal
comfort
·
lighting
and acoustic environment
Modern
European citizens spend on average over 90% of their time indoors. Indoor air
originates from outdoors, carrying outdoor air contaminants indoors with
varying degrees of penetration: some are effectively transferred indoors (e.g.
for PM2.5 penetration ranges from 50–90%), others are adsorbed on indoor
surfaces or readily react with indoor air co-pollutants (e.g. ozone). In
addition, indoor environments themselves contain sources of contaminants,
which, due to the rate of air exchange in comparison to outdoor environments,
can contribute considerably to high pollutant levels. Indoor environments have
been widely studied for a range of chemicals and biological contaminants; in
the presence of indoor sources, indoor concentrations of contaminants are
higher, sometimes 10 or 20 times higher (e.g. formaldehyde), than those
recorded in outdoor environments.
Figure 1.
French National IAQ Survey, CSTB.
In combination,
the generally higher indoor concentrations of contaminants and the overwhelming
fraction of time spent by individuals indoors, mean that indoor air pollution
is the dominant source of air pollution exposure regardless of whether the
sources are indoors or outdoors. Indoor Air Quality is a complex result of
occupant’s activities, human responses, source emission, and contaminant
removal.
Most indoor
air pollutants arise from chemicals, through the use of cleaning products, air
freshener and pesticides, and via emissions from furniture and construction
materials, as well as from heating and cooking. Cooking emissions, for
instance, have long been seen primarily as an odour problem. However, recent
field studies showed that Particulate Matter (PM) is a significant health risk
of indoor air (Logue, 2013) and cooking can be a major source of PM2.5 [2].
In
addition, outdoor sources can contribute considerably to indoor air pollution.
Microbiological contaminants which may induce allergies and asthma also require
consideration as indoor air pollutants. Examples of potential serious effects
include respiratory disorders, including asthma and cancer.
Figure 2.
Health Effects of indoor air quality. [1]
Whilst CO2 is considered as non-toxic, very high levels
(typically not in residential buildings) have been shown to cause health
problems for occupants.
However,
from an indoor air quality standpoint, CO2 is a
surrogate measure for indoor pollutants emitted by humans as it is correlated
with human metabolic activity and humans are the main indoor source of CO2. Unusually, high indoor levels of CO2 can cause occupants to grow drowsy, develop headaches
and suffer from impaired activity levels [3] (Figure 3).
Indoor CO2 levels are an indicator of the adequacy
of outdoor air ventilation relative to indoor occupant density and metabolic
activity; with the highest levels of CO2 typically
recorded in bedrooms. Therefore, interior CO2
levels are used as a scientifically accepted method of measuring how efficient
a ventilation system is at maintaining the ventilation rate required to refresh
the air.
Figure 3.
Impact of CO2 on Human Decision-Making
Performance. Error bars indicate one standard deviation. [3].
Humans are
the main indoor source of CO2. Indoor levels are
an indicator of the adequacy of outdoor air ventilation relative to indoor
occupant density and metabolic activity. Typically, the highest CO2 levels are measured in bedrooms. Thus, interior CO2 levels are a useful way to measure how efficient the
ventilation system is at maintaining the ventilation rate required to refresh
the airflow.
Considering
the aspects stated above, we can summarise the requirements for a residential
building and its ventilation. The Building is
·
energy
efficient and uses renewable energy,
·
gives
protection from any inside and outside harmful impact,
·
provides
a good and healthy indoor environment,
·
and
operates automatically and in a user friendly (smart) manner.
Europe has
a wide range of climate zones and a big variety of building and construction
traditions. This leads in parallel to a wide range of ventilation solutions for
different applications. This is an advantage, because the building owner may
select his preferred solution.
We
distinguish the following different ventilation systems and strategies:
•
Single technology systems
o All natural
o All mechanical (either
centralized or local)
§ extraction only (MEU)
§ positive input ventilation
§ bidirectional ventilation
with heat recovery (HRU)
•
Multiple or hybrid technology systems
These
systems may be equipped with:
·
Demand control (CO2, humidity, VOC, presence)
·
Heat recovery (Air/Air or Air/Water with a heat pump)
·
Smart feedback options
·
Filtration (depending on the system options)
The energy
impact of ventilation systems is covered in European and national EPB
calculation rules, as lead down in the EPB standards. The energy rating of the
ventilation products is declared according the Ecodesign and Energy Labelling
Directives.
However,
there is a distinct lack of information on IAQ performance. To correct for this
discrepancy, EVIA is supporting the development of an IAQ calculation procedure
[5] with the ambition of providing better information on the performance of
residential ventilation systems and units in relation to IAQ.
Modern
residential ventilation systems provide high levels of IAQ at a low energy
consumption. Therefore, it is surprising that up to now approximately 60% of
the building stock in the EU has no dedicated ventilation system
(Figure 4) [5]. The consequences are growing issues with
mould and poor IAQ. For ensuring good IAQ it is essential that provisions are
made to encourage proper installation of ventilation systems in the renovation
market.
Figure 4. Ventilations systems in Building stock. [5]
In most
Member States, there are requirements to install dedicated ventilation systems
in new residential buildings. There is however no EU legislation dealing with
the issue of IAQ in renovation and there is no provision in the EPBD requiring
IAQ information to be included in the Energy Performance Certificates. The
architect, designing engineer, consumer and users of the building are required
to take decisions with insufficient guidance on IAQ impacts, with the
associated risk that designers might pursue and consumers seek energy
optimisation at the expense of efficient ventilation.
Despite
this drawback, the ventilation market has grown robustly in recent years due to
the introduction of the EPBD. Mechanical extraction units (MEU) still dominate
the market, but heat recovery units has begun to constitute a larger share of
the market.
Figure 5.
Ventilation in Europe. [6]
However,
the picture does vary significantly from Member State to Member State, in large
part due climate variations. Nordic Member States tend to have a larger share
of Heat Recovery units, in a moderate climate there is more or less a balance
and in Southern Member States MEUs and intermittent fans remain the norm.
Variation
among Member States is illustrated effectively by comparing the French and
German markets. In Germany, a strong rate of growth is evident in sales of
single room units with heat recovery and units with an alternating air flow (push-pull)
which are directly mounted in the façade.
In
France, heat recovery units represent very small market share of about 5%, in
contrast to some markets where the market share for MEU/MVHR can range from
60/40 to 50/50 in new-builds.
Is
this enough? As EVIA we say no, because problems with bad IAQ are growing much
faster, and regulations (national and European) has to take notice of this fact
and should provide:
·
Minimum requirements (either national or European)
·
Consumer information in existing documentation and EPC.
Could
“smart home” solutions provide the answer to our issues?
If we
listen to the ongoing discussions, some people might think so, forgetting that
nobody knows what “smart” really means in this context. A definition cannot
extend only to a simple connection to any network which allows for remote on
and off, or changing the operation hours or setpoints.
Smartness
could mean that IAQ sensors (CO2/VOC/Humidity/temperature)
are used to continuously measure and monitor ambient conditions in the house
and provide real time feedback to a zone controller which manipulates the
ventilation rate to match the specific use and occupancy of the building whilst
ensuring the lowest possible energy consumption possible.
A
recent European study [8] on smartness and user behaviour concluded that “Home Energy
Management systems as a combination of intelligent controls for heating
ventilation and lighting consistently result in the lowest primary energy use
for the lowest cost …
The fact that innovative intelligent control systems can currently not be
valorised within the official Energy Performance evaluation tools of the
different EU member states clearly slows down the large scale deployment of
these promising energy saving measures.”
In
addition, smart ventilation systems could secure further energy efficiency
improvements by informing the building owner when servicing is needed or what
exact element needs replacing.
Therefore,
any definition of smartness in the context of ventilation should include
objectives beyond energy efficiency including:
·
Providing
good IAQ using adequate demand control solutions,
·
high
thermal comfort,
·
filtration
depending on outdoor air quality,
·
service
and maintenance,
·
network
connectivity and functions.
New
buildings, as well as renovations of the existing building stock, should aim
not just for good energy performance but also for high quality standards with
regard to the work undertaken, as this is a prerequisite for high building energy
performance. Various experiences show that there are cases where the quality of
the works is a (major) issue of concern [9]. Some EU Member States have imposed
or will impose in the near future independent compliance checks to ensure the
correct installation of ventilation systems.
Figure 6. Installations of residential
ventilation systems. |
The
Renewable Energy Directive (RED) recognises heat pumps as a renewable energy
technology and it is commonly accepted that outdoor air is a source of
Renewable Energy. In this context, other technologies using exhaust air (which
will become outdoor air once it has left a building) should be treated in the
same manner as renewable energy in the revised Directive.
There is no
technological or physical reason to handle recovered exhaust air differently
from ambient air (see Figure 7).
In highly
efficient NZEBs, the heating and cooling power demand for ventilation is the
dominant component of the energy consumption. The most effective device to
“generate” or recover the heating and cooling energy demand is heat recovery in
ventilation units (using passive systems or heat pumps in ventilation systems).
1 | 2 | 3 |
Fossil
Heating | Renewable
share Heating | Heat
recovery |
External and internal gains (solar, people, machines
etc.) – same in each case | ||
Transmission losses though the building envelope –
same in each case | ||
Fossil heating to cover the losses | Fossil heating to cover the losses not covered from
renewables | Fossil heating to cover the losses not covered from
waste heat use |
Ventilation losses | Ventilation losses | Ventilation losses |
No waste heat recovered | No waste heat recovered | Energy recovered from ventilation losses. |
Renewable heating | Waste heat use leads to the same result |
Figure 7. Energy flow in a building and renewable and waste energy.
The ongoing
revision of the EPBD is a great opportunity to drive much needed improvements
in the existing building stock and to promote systems and solutions that
combine to deliver high Indoor Air Quality, low energy consumption and consumer
empowerment. It is an essential tool to meet the EU’s climate and energy
targets and improve citizens’ health, comfort and productivity. Therefore, EVIA
and other organisations (REHVA among them) have requested the MEPs and the
Member States to take up the following issues during the inter-institutional
negotiations on the revision of the EPBD-directive:
1. Ensuring adequate indoor air quality in
European buildings
2. Regular inspections of ventilation systems
to achieve healthy and energy efficient buildings
3. Compliance checks to ensure a correct
installation
[1]
Olliviera Fernandes et al. Health Effects of indoor air quality… REHVA
Journal 4/2009 pp 13-17.
[2]
Efficiency of recirculation
hoods, Piet Jacobs, Wouter Borsboom, AIVC 2017.
[3]
Is CO2 an Indoor Pollutant? Higher Levels of CO2 May Diminish Decision Making Performance; William J. Fisk, Usha Satish,
Mark J. Mendell, Toshifumi Hotchi, Douglas Sullivan, Lawrence Berkeley National
Laboratory Berkeley, CA; State University of New York Upstate Medical
University Syracuse, NY.
[5]
Ecodesign Lot 10
Study and Supplementary Study, FGK, 2010.
[6]
EVIA estimations on
current ventilation market.
[7]
FGK BDH statistics –
residential ventilation units with heat recovery 2016
[9]
ICHAQAI - Impact de
la phase CHAntier sur la Qualité de l’Air Intérieur, Charline Dematteo, 2017.
Follow us on social media accounts to stay up to date with REHVA actualities
0