François Rémi Carrié
Senior Consultant, ICEE
Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
transmission, thermal bridges, compliance and quality, super insulation,
Photo credits: QUALICHeCK / Sympraxis Team
During the international
workshop held in Brussels on December 15, 2016, 59 participants from 13
countries exchanged their experience and views on ways to improve the quality
of installed insulation systems as well as to secure the compliance of
insulation product and system data.
Of course, these concerns are part of a much broader picture, in particular the European Union's willingness to lead the clean energy transition with the so-called "Clean Energy for All Europeans" legislative proposals. Because of its very significant share in energy use and GHG emissions, the building sector is largely concerned by these proposals, although a long-term vision for the building sector in 2050 as well as targets for the renovation of the existing building stock, where most of the potential lies, are missing (link to Frances Bean's presentation http://qualicheck-platform.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/QUALICHeCK-Workshop-Brussels-1.3-Bean.pdf).
Heat losses through the building envelope usually represent a substantial share of the energy losses of a building. Therefore, any gap between the actual and theoretical performance of systems implemented to reduce those losses (e.g., the U-value of an insulation panel) can result in very significant unexpected energy losses (link to Arnold Janssens' presentations http://qualicheck-platform.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/QUALICHeCK-Workshop-Brussels-1.2-Janssens.pdf). In the past 10 years, part of the Belgian approach to reduce this gap has been to build a set of measures to secure consistency between actual and reported performance and to have trustworthy sources to derive product characteristics. More specifically, the 3 Belgian regions developed a website with product characteristics to be used in energy performance assessment for many product families in order to facilitate the work of the expert who has to select input data (link to Peter Wouters', http://qualicheck-platform.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/QUALICHeCK-Workshop-Brussels-1.1-Wouters.pdf). Quality frameworks were developed for existing cavity walls and internal insulation to ensure that the products would be installed according to specifications (link to Timo de Mets' presentation, http://qualicheck-platform.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/QUALICHeCK-Workshop-Brussels-2.2-De-Mets.pdf).
The issue of thermal bridges was specifically addressed during this workshop because their influence is magnified in (nearly) zero-energy buildings. In fact, there can be more heat losses through thermal bridges than through walls in such buildings if the designer overlooks their influence. A review of calculation methods in 9 EU member states showed that, although thermal bridge impacts were addressed in all countries, compliance and verification processes were often missing. How tabulated or default values correspond to the real values of as built solutions in construction site, is therefore often not known (link to Jarek Kurnitski’s presentation http://qualicheck-platform.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/QUALICHeCK-Workshop-Brussels-2.3-Kurnitski.pdf).
Super insulating materials such as vacuum insulation panels (VIP) or aerogels represent a small market share as of today; however, they show great potential for the renovation market. Many examples in Europe but also in the USA, China, Japan were presented showing how these could be implemented, including in listed buildings with strong aesthetics and architectural constraints, or in expensive districts to save floor area (link to Daniel Quenard's presentation http://qualicheck-platform.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/QUALICHeCK-Workshop-Brussels-3.1-Quenard.pdf, and Par Johansson's presentations http://qualicheck-platform.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/QUALICHeCK-Workshop-Brussels-3.3-Johansson.pdf). Significant progress has been made over the past few years to make these materials less fragile and easier to handle.
Research is on-going to characterise the in-situ performance of super insulation systems and specify the conditions under which they can be installed. A CEN Technical Committee (TC 88) is working on the characterisation of the long-term performance of vacuum insulation panels, in particular as they are subjected to temperature and humidity stress (link to Roland Cap's presentation http://qualicheck-platform.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/QUALICHeCK-Workshop-Brussels-3.2-Caps.pdf).
Technical approval frameworks are meant to assess risks, to check the fitness for purpose, and to document specifications for workmanship for a given product or system. They go beyond harmonised standards and European Technical Assessments which are limited to product characteristics to be declared in relation to its essential characteristics as defined in the Construction Product Regulation (305/2011). During a round table discussion, panel members shared their thoughts about an increasing need for technical approvals to have common references for issues not covered by harmonisation such as workmanship. Note that there already exist several technical approvals for vacuum insulation panels and aerogels that provide reliable data for their properties and durability as well as specifications for their implementation on site (link to Daniel Quenard's presentation http://qualicheck-platform.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/QUALICHeCK-Workshop-Brussels-3.1-Quenard.pdf).
There are interesting initiatives to guide the market toward achieving high performance insulation. For example, there exists an array of tools to secure the quality of External Thermal Insulation Composite Systems (ETICS) including the EAE’s European Application Guideline for ETICS or certification schemes operational in Austria and Germany (link to Ralf Pasker's presentation http://qualicheck-platform.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/QUALICHeCK-Workshop-Brussels-3.4-Pasker.pdf). As for the thermal performance of residential pitched roofs, the European Insulation Manufacturers Association (Eurima) insisted on a system approach and basic understanding of building professionals of the challenges, for instance, when wind "washes" the insulation and therefore degrades its performance. The presenters also insisted on appropriate quality checks and showed positive feedback from their implementation in social housing retrofit in Eeklo, Belgium (link to Ross Holleron and Jelle Langmans' presentations http://qualicheck-platform.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/QUALICHeCK-Workshop-Brussels-4.1-Holleron.pdf).
Finally, the workshop was the occasion to discuss the perspectives given by information technology to ease the documentation and checks in building construction. The construction and commissioning phases account for 10-30% and 15-30% each of the gap between expected and actual energy use in a building. To contain these problems, smart phone applications developed in the Built2Spec project help perform and document quality checks during the construction phase, for instance, with a user friendly interface to archive georeferenced pictures as evidence. User friendly interfaces are operational or under development with innovative solutions to measure building airtightness, acoustic and indoor air quality, and 3D scanning (link to Andrea Costa's presentation http://qualicheck-platform.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/QUALICHeCK-Workshop-Brussels-4.2-Costa.pdf). The perspective for such tools, in a context where the need for evidence of compliant product and installation is increasing, seems promising.
The workshop was organised by INIVE EEIG on behalf of the QUALICHeCK consortium in cooperation with EURIMA, EAE, VIPA, UEATC and EOTA, and with the support of the Flemish Energy Agency (VEA) and the Walloon Region.
of the workshop are available on: http://qualicheck-platform.eu/events/workshops/
QUALICHeCK responds to the challenges related to compliance of Energy
Performance Certificate (EPC) declarations and the quality of the building
works. Find out more at http://qualicheck-platform.eu.
project is co-funded by the Intelligent Energy Europe Programme of the European
Union. The sole responsibility for the content of this article lies with the
author(s). It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Union.
Neither the EASME nor the European Commission are responsible for any use that
may be made of the information contained therein.